Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electrons & Braggs Law

  1. Jun 4, 2004 #1
    Hi - come across a problem I am unsure if I am doing the right way.

    At what energy is Bragg's Law satisfied to first order in Cu given that the lattice parameter is a=0.361nm

    i) Electrons propogate in the [100] direction
    ii) [110] direction

    My basic step was
    [tex]$2d_{hkl} \sin \theta = n\lambda $

    [tex]$d_{hkl} = \frac{a}{{\sqrt {h^2 + k^2 + l^2 } }}$

    I was unsure what to do with theta, however I seem to recall coming across a similar problem, where we assumed electon-lattic interctions caused a reflection, so theta=90. However this seems a little hazy to me.

    So upon finding the wavelength I then used
    [tex]$E = \frac{{\hbar ^2 }}{{2m}}\left| k \right|^2 {\rm{, where }}k = \frac{{2\pi }}{\lambda }$

    I think I got about 2 ev. Is this the right approach?

    And finally...comparing this to the Fermi energy of Cu (7ev), "comment on the significant of this comparision with respect to teh assumption of free electrons in Cu". Since E < E[f], do I conclude this is a good assumption??

    Thanks in advance
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 7, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This is a little different from the way I'm familiar with using Bragg's Law. If you are doing X-ray or electron diffraction off a crystalline solid, the ratios of the sines of the peak angles tell you what the unit cell structure is (bcc, fcc, etc.), and the values of the angles tell you the plane spacing (or lattice parameter).

    Have not thought about how to use Bragg's Law to deal with electronic transport within the lattice. Clearly, as you've indicated, "what is theta ?" is a good question that need resolving. Hmmm...will think about this.
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2004
  4. Jun 7, 2004 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think you want to say that [tex] sin(\theta) <= 1, so
    \lambda <= d[/tex]

    This cannot be wrong...but may not be sufficient.
  5. Jun 9, 2004 #4
    If electrons are propogating in the [100] direction they are travelling perpendicular to a plane though the x-axis. Thus when they interact with that plane, they are reflected at 90 deg. What about all other planes? this is bothering me!
  6. Jun 14, 2004 #5
    Using a=0.361nm and theta=90 (i.e. normal incidence and 180 change in direction or back scattering) gives Lamda=a, and Bragg's law is satisfied for Ea=11.5eV (23eV) for i (ii). Try your numbers again, and see if you agree.

    So this is the opposite. Ea>Ef=7eV, which makes Cu free electron like, and is thus a good assumption. If Ea=Ef, then one has the extreme case of an insulator, ie NOT a free electron. Internal electrons keep getting backscattered because of the lattice periodicity, and therefore do not move, hence an insulator.
  7. Jun 14, 2004 #6
    Well I have the 'official' answersr now: 2.89eV and 1.45 eV

    In both cases the opening of the enegry gap due to the lattic interaction or Bragg reflection, is well away from the Cu Fermi energy of 7eV. The condunction band of Cu is always partially filled, and Cu maintains its metallica nature.
  8. Jun 15, 2004 #7
    Right, the Bragg law is

    2*d_hkl*sin(theta) = n*Lamda

    I was using the what you wrote without the factor 2. Still, as long as the energy isn't in the vicinty of Ef, free electron model is fine I think.
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2004
  9. Aug 4, 2004 #8
    Use a different form of Bragg's law

    Hopefully, I won't mess up the Latex typsetting too much, I'll try to come back and fix it later.

    a = .361 nm
    Braggs law using the Reciprocal lattice vector G is

    k = (1/2)G

    Then the energy is

    E = [tex]{hbar^2}{k^2}[/tex]/(2m)
    Ignore the first "/" in this equation. I can't edit it out!

    [tex]{k^2}= (1/4){G^2}[/tex]
    which is needed in the equation for the energy that was given in a post above.

    G = [tex]h b _1 + kb_2 + l b_3[/tex]
    where h,k,l are the miller indices and the b's are the primitive lattice vectors for the fcc recpirical lattice.

    So for the first part in the [100] direction,
    [tex]{G^2} = b^2_1[/tex]

    The result for the energy is
    E = 3 [tex]{hbar^2}{pi^2}[/tex]/[tex]({a^2}{2m})[/tex]
    = 3 * 2.89 eV = 8.6 eV

    For the [110] direction,

    [tex]G = b_1 + b_2[/tex]

    [tex]{G^2} = b^2_2 + 2b_1 b_2 + b^2_1 [/tex]

    and the energy is

    E = 4 [tex]{hbar^2}{pi^2}/{a^2}[/tex]2m

    = 4 * 2.89 eV
    = 11.5 eV

    The fermi energy for Copper is 7 eV. The fermi energy is the energy of the uppermost electrons. Since this energy is below the top of the bands (which are at the Bragg planes) the band is only partially filled and Copper is a metal. In previous posts, the assumption was made that theta = 90, this assumption cannot be made.

    According to the nearly free electron model, the major effect of the lattice is at the Bagg planes. Since Copper's fermi energy is well below the Bragg plane energy, the free electron model works.
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2004
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Electrons & Braggs Law
  1. Bragg's law (Replies: 4)