Understanding Electron Kinetic Energy in Quantum Wells

In summary: IOW, what value you assign to it is arbitrary. The only thing that matters is the difference in potential energy.Zz.The photobucket links don't work for me. Which page of the second set of slides do you mean?I'm sorry for the links, i don't know why they are not working, but the pages are 36,37,50 from first slide and 5 from second slide.In summary, the conversation discussed the behavior of electrons in bulk semiconductor versus those confined to a quantum well. The question revolved around the third dimensional kinetic energy component of electrons in a quantum well and whether it is added to the other two dimensions. The conversation also touched on the confusion surrounding discrete energy levels in
  • #1
rts20
8
0
Hello to All !
I have a question that Whenever an electron from bulk material trapped by a quantum well that electron's 3rd dimensional kinetic energy component vanishes, But where that goes, is it added to the other 2 dimensional kinetic energy components..?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What i am asking is electrons in bulk semiconductor have 3 degree of freedom so they have 3 dimensional kinetic energy component, but Whenever an electron from bulk material captured by a quantum well (where it has only 2 degree of freedom) that electron's 3rd dimensional kinetic energy component vanishes., But where that goes, is it added to the other 2 dimensions?
 
  • #3
When electrons in bulk material they have 3 degree of freedom(moves freely in all 3 directions) and hence their kinetic energy is 3 dimensional. but whenever electrons confined to quantum dot it's all 3 degree of freedom vanishes and so is their kinetic energy also losses..?
 
  • #4
(I merged your threads)

You can (but don't have to) still have discrete excitations. It is a bit similar to the electron levels in an atom.
 
  • #5
Why should an electron in a semiconductor have the same energy (or possibly have) as a quantum dot? Naturally the description of the quantum dot has a degree of freedom less.
 
  • #6
This whole thread is very strange, mainly because of the question on the "kinetic energy". Do you also ask for the kinetic energy in a 1D quantum well problem? After all, it is practically the same thing. It is also unclear what exactly is the question of interest here. Is it a question on reduced dimensions in solids, or a question specifically on the band diagram of a quantum dot?

As it is now, the question itself is going in all different dimensions. I wish it could have been reduced to zero dimension.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes Douglas Sunday
  • #7
I am also so confused..What are these discrete energy levels in quantum dot and what type of energy(potential or kinetic energy) electrons will have if they lies in these discrete level..??
 
  • #8
rts20 said:
I am also so confused..What are these discrete energy levels in quantum dot and what type of energy(potential or kinetic energy) electrons will have if they lies in these discrete level..??

Are you saying that you are confused with your own questions? Now that's precious!

You have not addressed the question for clarification that I asked. So this response doesn't add anything to clear up the confusion.

Zz.
 
  • #9
ZapperZ said:
Are you saying that you are confused with your own questions? Now that's precious!

You have not addressed the question for clarification that I asked. So this response doesn't add anything to clear up the confusion.

Zz.
What i am asking is that in some books these discrete levels are treated as electrons kinetic energy while in some books they are electrons potential energy levels,which one is correct..? that is my confusion.
 
  • #10
rts20 said:
What i am asking is that in some books these discrete levels are treated as electrons kinetic energy while in some books they are electrons potential energy levels,which one is correct..? that is my confusion.

Please cite these sources and the exact phrasing.

But besides that, I asked you why you think this is any different than a simple 1D potential well problem that we all have done in intro QM. You never answered that.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
ZapperZ said:
Please cite these sources and the exact phrasing.
I googled a lot to find these topics from my old books but i didn't find exact.
But i just managed few..
here in this slide from this http://faculty.uml.edu/cbaird/QCLPresentationApril2011.pdf shows that the bottom of discrete energy level in quantum well is Potential(P.E),
while in this slide from this site shows that the energy of discrete level equal to kinetic(K.E),
because all the energy of electron in quantum well is kinetic(En) from this pdf first page too.
ZapperZ said:
But besides that, I asked you why you think this is any different than a simple 1D potential well problem that we all have done in intro QM. You never answered that.
Zz.
QM intro..? I think i missed that, But in every quantum well topic they says that electrons potential energy in QW is zero and all the energy is kinetic only..
but i think these discrete energy levels(quantization En) must be potential and kinetic energy is only due to electron motion in non-confinement direction(Kxy) as shown here.
 
  • #12
The photobucket links don't work for me. Which page of the second set of slides do you mean?
rts20 said:
that the bottom of discrete energy level in quantum well is Potential(P.E),
At k=0, the kinetic energy is zero. Not that it would matter, as only energy differences are relevant.

There is no energy eigenstate at exactly k=0. While there are states with very low kinetic energy in bands in solids, this is no longer true for quantum wells with a very limited spatial size.
rts20 said:
But in every quantum well topic they says that electrons potential energy in QW is zero and all the energy is kinetic only..
The definitionof absolute potential energy is arbitrary. It is convenient to set it to zero inside a quantum well, but this is completely arbitrary.
 
  • #13
mfb said:
The photobucket links don't work for me. Which page of the second set of slides do you mean?
the second set of slides also just like this pdf first page, where the eigenstate energy (En) is treated as kinetic energy of electrons in QW.
mfb said:
There is no energy eigenstate at exactly k=0.
I can understand that the lowest eigenstate (E1) starts from K1 as shown here .

what i can't understand is that eigenstate energy (En) is electrons kinetic energy or potential energy ? I think according to E-K digram En must be kinetic energy of the electron with momentum Kn, is that right..?
 
  • #14
rts20 said:
the second set of slides also just like this pdf first page, where the eigenstate energy (En) is treated as kinetic energy of electrons in QW.

I can understand that the lowest eigenstate (E1) starts from K1 as shown here .

what i can't understand is that eigenstate energy (En) is electrons kinetic energy or potential energy ? I think according to E-K digram En must be kinetic energy of the electron with momentum Kn, is that right..?

The problem here is that you're trying to relate "k" with kinetic energy, and in this scenario, it doesn't work.

Let's back up a bit and go over something that you should already know (and which I now have doubts since you appear to have missed the 1D quantum well in intro QM). When you do tunneling phenomena, you define kinetic energy as Ek = E - V. You do not define it in terms of "k", the wave number. So already for a "traveling wave" case, you simply can't directly use k.

But now, you not only can't directly relate k to kinetic energy, you also have a standing wave situation. These are not traveling wave solution to the Schrodinger equation. All the wave function can tell you is the probability of where the particle is inside the well, and the energy state.

This is no different than asking for how fast an electron in an s-orbital of an atom is moving or orbiting around the nucleus.

Zz.
 
  • #15
ZapperZ said:
The problem here is that you're trying to relate "k" with kinetic energy
yes because as i already told i have confused with electrons energy and momentum in quantum well..
here in this first https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Nann/publication/229622377/figure/fig6/AS:273339474247686@1442180617554/Figure-8-8-Free-charge-carriers-in-a-solid-have-a-parabolic-dispersion-relation.png eigenstates are fixed inside e-k diagram with fixed energy and momentum always non-zero,
in this second pic2 e-k diagrams are starting from fixed eigenstates where the only momentum starting from zero,
which one of them is correct and what is the meaning of them ?
 

1. What is electron's kinetic energy?

Electron's kinetic energy is the energy that an electron possesses due to its motion.

2. How is electron's kinetic energy calculated?

Electron's kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the electron and v is its velocity.

3. What is the unit of measurement for electron's kinetic energy?

The unit of measurement for electron's kinetic energy is joules (J).

4. How does temperature affect electron's kinetic energy?

As temperature increases, the kinetic energy of electrons also increases, causing them to move faster and have a higher energy level.

5. Can electron's kinetic energy be converted into other forms of energy?

Yes, electron's kinetic energy can be converted into other forms of energy such as heat or light when electrons collide with other particles or atoms.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
927
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
843
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
876
Back
Top