1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Elementary Trig Question

  1. May 4, 2008 #1
    Say I have an acute angle A in standard position in the first quadrant with a rotating arm of length r , terminating at coordinate P(a,b) . Now say I rotate it 90 degrees further from that position to the second quadrant , this ends up at coordinate Q(-a,b) . I draw perpendiculars from those two positions to the x axis .

    for the first triangle , sin A = b/r and cos A = a/r

    as for the second triangle , why is sin (90+A) = a/r = cos A
    and why is cos(90+A) = -b/r = -sin A

    Im confused ... how can you compute the trig ratio for an angle greater than 90 degress ? Why not take the ratio for the acute angle (180 - (90+a))

    Pls Help .
  2. jcsd
  3. May 4, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Welcome to PF!

    Hi ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

    No … (-a,b) is the reflection of (a,b) in the y-axis.

    You want Q(b,-a).

    Then everythihng will make sense! :smile:
  4. May 4, 2008 #3
    hmm ... but that doesn't solve my problem ... I need to know why the so called "reference angle" or the "corresponding acute angle" actually works for angles greater than 90 degrees , when taking sines and cosines or tangents . Is there a geometric argument for it ???
  5. May 4, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Im not entirely sure what your question is; but if it boils down to "why is cos(x)=sin(x+90) ?", then you can answer this by looking at the graphs of the sine and cosine functions.
  6. May 4, 2008 #5
    Heres my problem ...

    For the triangle in the second quadrant , why does my book state

    sin(90+theta) = a/r and cos(90+theta) = -b/r

    when clearly (90+theta) isn't even one of the angles in the triangle ... ??? This was what I meant when I said why not calculate (180-90-theta) ....

    I dont get this part .... !!! Ive looked up 2/3 trig books by native authors (I live in Nepal) and they don't seem to explain why this is so ... and I have yet to find a good trig book on the internet .... Thanks a mil .
    Last edited: May 4, 2008
  7. May 4, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi pokemonDoom! :smile:
    No … the triangle is not in the second quadrant … its base is still in the first quadrant, and its tip is in the second quadrant.

    For an easy example, consider the two triangles OAB and OAC, where O = (0,0), A = (1,0), B = (1,1), and C = (-1,1). So OA = 1, and OB = OC = √2. Put D = (-1,0).

    Then angle AOB = 45º, and angle AOC = 135º.

    And cosAOB = OA/OB = 1/√2, cosAOC = AD/OC = -1/√2.

    But sinAOB = AB/OB = 1/√2, sinAOC = DC/OC = 1/√2. :smile:
  8. May 5, 2008 #7
    Hello Tim ,

    Im confused ...

    how can the cosine of <AOC be AD/OC ... if I know better , its probably a typo .

    and in triangle-DOC (which lies squarely on the second quadrant of my graph) how is it that the sine of <AOC is equivalent to the sine of <DOC ... This is the question in the first place .

    Many thanks .
  9. May 5, 2008 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi pokemonDoom! :smile:

    Yes … sorry … it should be cosAOC = OD/OC = -1/√2. :redface:
    Because sin = opposite/hypotenuse.

    The side opposite angle AOB is AB, and the side opposite angle AOC is DC.

    And AB = DC, so sinAOB = sinAOC. :smile:

    (and of course, the diagram works for any angle, not just 45º)
  10. May 5, 2008 #9
    ... I get it !!!

    But isnt the angle opposite side DC <DOC ... ? Im not trying to sound dumb but what youre trying to say is exactly what the question is .

    Why should sineAOC =CD/OC , when its perfectly legible that sineDOC = CD/OC .

    In essence what youre trying to say is for any angle greater than 90 degrees , the ratio of that angle is equal to the ratio of the acute angle formed with the nearest x axis ... ?? but why? is there a geometric proof of some kind ?? instead of just guessing that the ratios are equal ?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook