- #1
dyn
- 758
- 57
Hi.
I'm following the "derivation" in some lecture notes which shows that the Electric and Magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation. There are 2 points I don't understand
A solution to the wave equation for E-fields is given as E = E0 exp i(ωt-kz).
It then states that if the propagation is along z only then ∂/∂x and ∂/∂y of any property is zero. Why is this so ?
Using Gauss's law this then leads to ∂Ez/∂z = 0 which implies Ez is a constant which is set to zero. But we also have ∂Ex/∂x = 0 and ∂Ey/∂y = 0 so why aren't Ex and Ey equal to a constant which can be set to zero ? I realize this would give no wave.
Thanks
I'm following the "derivation" in some lecture notes which shows that the Electric and Magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation. There are 2 points I don't understand
A solution to the wave equation for E-fields is given as E = E0 exp i(ωt-kz).
It then states that if the propagation is along z only then ∂/∂x and ∂/∂y of any property is zero. Why is this so ?
Using Gauss's law this then leads to ∂Ez/∂z = 0 which implies Ez is a constant which is set to zero. But we also have ∂Ex/∂x = 0 and ∂Ey/∂y = 0 so why aren't Ex and Ey equal to a constant which can be set to zero ? I realize this would give no wave.
Thanks