EM radiation and Nuclear Radiation

  • Thread starter madking153
  • Start date
  • #1
madking153
37
0
hi , got 2 question about radiation:

1. Microwaves , radiowaves ,gamma rays and visible light - which one cannot detected by film?

2. Gamma rays , beta rays ,neutrons and alphas - which one has the shortest range in tissue ?( assume equal enegy)

thanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
kawikdx225
83
0
madking153 said:
hi , got 2 question about radiation:

1. Microwaves , radiowaves ,gamma rays and visible light - which one cannot detected by film?

2. Gamma rays , beta rays ,neutrons and alphas - which one has the shortest range in tissue ?( assume equal enegy)

thanks

1. My guess would be the one with the lowest frequency.

2. I would think the largest (most massive) particle would have the shortest range.
 
  • #3
mathman
Science Advisor
8,071
543
1. Microwaves , radiowaves ,gamma rays and visible light - which one cannot detected by film?
The longer wavelengths (microwaves, radio waves) cannot be detected by film.

2. Gamma rays , beta rays ,neutrons and alphas - which one has the shortest range in tissue ?( assume equal enegy)
Charge particles (beta and alpha) have much shorter ranges, with alpha (heavier) shorter than beta. Neutral particles (gamma and neutrons) will penetrate quite deeply.
 
  • #4
madking153
37
0
Can u explain why microwaves and radiowave cannot detected my film ? thanks
 
  • #5
pmb_phy
2,952
1
madking153 said:
hi , got 2 question about radiation:

1. Microwaves , radiowaves ,gamma rays and visible light - which one cannot detected by film?
Microwaves and radiowaves can't be detected by photographic film. I'm not sure about gamma rays but I doub't film can detect them.
2. Gamma rays , beta rays ,neutrons and alphas - which one has the shortest range in tissue ?( assume equal enegy)
I'm not sure that we can assume equal energy since the distance is a function of energy. Therefore it may be the case that when one has a lower energy it has a shorter range and when the energy is higher the range changes. Sorry if that doesn't help.

Pete
 
  • #6
madking153
37
0
well, it is a question from Raphex - exam from Radiology ....
 
  • #7
pmb_phy
2,952
1
madking153 said:
well, it is a question from Raphex - exam from Radiology ....
So I take it that it doesn't give an answer anywhere (else you wouldn't be asking)?

Are you familiar with that Bragg curve? If so then take a look at it and compare the absorption curve with the absorption curve of neutral particles. It may help.

Pete
 

Suggested for: EM radiation and Nuclear Radiation

  • Last Post
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
827
Replies
14
Views
828
Replies
14
Views
708
  • Last Post
2
Replies
45
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
426
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
18K
Top