EMrocket engine

  • Thread starter duordi134
  • Start date
  • #1
44
0
Recently there has been much discussion about an EM rocket engine China has built which
clams to give propulsion without ejecting mass, violating Newtons conservation of momentum.

Does Einsteins General relativity equations require conservation of momentum?
Does this claim violate General or special relativity also?

Thanks

Duordi
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PAllen
Science Advisor
8,283
1,545
Recently there has been much discussion about an EM rocket engine China has built which
clams to give propulsion without ejecting mass, violating Newtons conservation of momentum.

Does Einsteins General relativity equations require conservation of momentum?
Does this claim violate General or special relativity also?

Thanks

Duordi
Please provide a ling to what you are discussing. Light is oscillating EM field, light propulsion is well known and non-controversial (though not very practical so far). Without a link, I have no idea if what you refer is speculative or just garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,157
4,999
Does Einsteins General relativity equations require conservation of momentum?

Conservation of momentum applies in GR just as in newtonian physics.

Does this claim violate General or special relativity also?

No, it will still obey all of GR/SR rules. The key question is how does it work, which may or may not require quantum theories to explain it. There doesn't seem to be a consensus as to how it works at this time.
 
  • #5
PAllen
Science Advisor
8,283
1,545
I don't think there can be meaningful discussion of this here. At present, there is no peer reviewed theory or reliable independent studies. It is not necessary to say there is definitely nothing here to be able to say this is well outside what can be discussed on physics forums.
 
  • #6
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
19,221
2,685
  • #7
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,157
4,999
There is no consensus that it works.

After re-reading the wiki article I'm inclined to agree. I just skimmed over the replication claims section the first time.
 
  • #8
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,157
4,999
I don't think there can be meaningful discussion of this here. At present, there is no peer reviewed theory or reliable independent studies. It is not necessary to say there is definitely nothing here to be able to say this is well outside what can be discussed on physics forums.

I didn't see your post until just now, but I'm inclined to agree. There's not enough data for us to discuss the details of the engine, and I already answered the specific questions the OP had. Thread locked.
 

Related Threads on EMrocket engine

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
464
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Top