Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading

In summary, for quasi-brittle materials, there is an energetic size effect and a statistical size effect, but the former only plays a role in the presence of a stress gradient. In the case of tensile loading, where the stress is uniform, the energetic size effect does not occur.
  • #1
person123
328
52
TL;DR Summary
Is there no energetic size effect for tensile loading because there is no stress gradient?
For quasi-brittle materials, there is an energetic size effect as well as a statistical size effect, as described here. However, it seems to require a stress gradient for it to play a role, as in the example given with a 3-point bending test. The stress at the middle of the fracture process zone, which is less than the stress at crack initiation due to the stress gradient, is equal to the material strength at failure (it is at this location where the material is being damaged). This causes the maximum load to be greater than expected as the size of beam decreases. (It's very possible this is wrong, so please correct me if it is!)

In the case of tensile loading, the stress is (at least ideally) uniform, so there is no stress gradient. Would this then mean that there is no energetic size effect?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, in the case of tensile loading, there is no energetic size effect because there is no stress gradient. The stress is uniform, so any size effects that are observed will be due to statistical size effects rather than energetic size effects.
 

What is the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading?

The Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading is a phenomenon in materials science where the mechanical properties of a material, specifically its strength and ductility, are affected by the size of the material. This effect is observed when the size of the material is reduced to the nanoscale.

What causes the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading?

The Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading is caused by the increasing dominance of surface and interface energy as the size of the material decreases. At the nanoscale, the surface area to volume ratio becomes much larger, leading to a higher proportion of atoms located at surfaces and interfaces, which have higher energy compared to the bulk of the material.

How does the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading affect the strength of a material?

The Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading results in a decrease in the strength of a material as its size is reduced. This is due to the fact that the surface and interface energy of the material becomes more dominant, leading to a decrease in the cohesive forces between atoms and a decrease in the ability of the material to resist deformation.

Can the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading be beneficial in any way?

Yes, the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading can be beneficial in certain applications. For example, in some cases, a decrease in the strength of a material can lead to an increase in its ductility, making it more flexible and less prone to brittle fracture. This can be advantageous in certain engineering applications.

How is the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading studied and measured?

The Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading is studied and measured using various techniques such as tensile testing, atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. These techniques allow for the characterization of the mechanical properties and microstructure of materials at the nanoscale, providing insights into the Energetic Size Effect for Tensile Loading.

Similar threads

  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
796
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top