Proving the Hamiltonian Operator in QFT with Klein Gordon Lagrangian

In summary: Oops. yeah that's my mistake, it's there when you derive the expression for the Hamiltonian but not in the final expression.
  • #1
latentcorpse
1,444
0
The Hamiltonian operator in quantum field theory (of Klein Gordon Lagrangian) is

[itex]H=\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger a_{\vec{p}}[/itex] after normal ordering

Now we construct energy eigenstates by acting on the vacuum [itex]|0 \rangle[/itex] with [itex]a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger[/itex] i.e. [itex] | \vec{p} \rangle = a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger | 0 \rangle[/itex]

And I want to show that [itex]H | \vec{p} \rangle = \omega_{\vec{p}} | \vec{p} \rangle[/itex]

This is proving rather difficult but should be fairly easy I think.

[itex]H | \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger a_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger | 0 \rangle \\
=\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger | 0 \rangle \\
=\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} | \vec{p} \rangle[/itex]

But I don't see how that last line gives the answer I want.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
latentcorpse said:
[itex]H | \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger a_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger | 0 \rangle \\
=\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} a_{\vec{p}}^\dagger | 0 \rangle \\
=\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_{\vec{p}} | \vec{p} \rangle[/itex]
What did you do between the first and second integrals? In other words, where did the [itex]a^\dagger a[/itex] go?

You should be using the commutation relation for the creation and annihilation operators. This will allow you to evaluate the integral.
 
  • #3
vela said:
What did you do between the first and second integrals? In other words, where did the [itex]a^\dagger a[/itex] go?

You should be using the commutation relation for the creation and annihilation operators. This will allow you to evaluate the integral.

so i can rewrite the 1st integral as

[itex]H | \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_p a_p a_p^\dagger a_p^\dagger | 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{2} \int d^3p \omega_p \delta^{(3)}(0) a_p^\dagger | 0 \rangle[/itex]

Now the delta term givens an infinity which we can just ignore because we're only concerned with energy differences (I think this is correct according to my notes?)

and so we get
[itex]H | \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_p a_p a_p^\dagger a_p^\dagger | 0 \rangle= \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3p}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_p a_p a_p^\dagger | p \rangle[/itex]

but i don't know how to treat the [itex]a_p^\dagger[/itex] acting on [itex]|p \rangle[/itex]? should i use the commutation relations again?

thanks.
 
  • #4
You need to be a bit more careful. The [itex]\vec{p}[/itex] in [itex]|\vec{p}\rangle[/itex] isn't the same as the variable you're integrating over. You should have

[tex]H | p \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3q}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_q a_q^\dagger a_q a_p^\dagger | 0 \rangle[/tex]

Also, you want to move the annihilation operator to the right, not to the left as you did.
 
  • #5
vela said:
You need to be a bit more careful. The [itex]\vec{p}[/itex] in [itex]|\vec{p}\rangle[/itex] isn't the same as the variable you're integrating over. You should have

[tex]H | p \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3q}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_q a_q^\dagger a_q a_p^\dagger | 0 \rangle[/tex]

Also, you want to move the annihilation operator to the right, not to the left as you did.

so i used the commutator of the last two operators this gave

[itex]\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3q}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_q a_q^\dagger a_p^\dagger a_q | 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3 q}{(2 \pi)^3} \omega_q a_q^\dagger (2 \pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(q-p) | 0 \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \omega_p | p \rangle[/itex]

where i got rid of the first term as i have an annihilation operator on a vacuum state. The only problem is i am left with this factor of 1/2 that i don't want there.

any ideas where i have messed up?

thanks.
 
  • #6
Are you sure the factor of 1/2 is supposed to be there in the first place?
 
  • #7
vela said:
Are you sure the factor of 1/2 is supposed to be there in the first place?

oops. yeah that's my mistake, it's there when you derive the expression for the Hamiltonian but not in the final expression.
 

1. What is the Hamiltonian Operator in Quantum Field Theory (QFT)?

The Hamiltonian operator in QFT is a mathematical operator that represents the total energy of a quantum system. It is used to describe the time evolution of a quantum state, and is an essential tool in understanding the behavior of particles in quantum field theories.

2. What is the Klein Gordon Lagrangian in QFT?

The Klein Gordon Lagrangian is a mathematical formula that describes the dynamics of a scalar field in QFT. It relates the field's energy and momentum to its spatial and temporal variations, and is used to derive the equations of motion for the field.

3. How is the Hamiltonian Operator proven using the Klein Gordon Lagrangian?

The Hamiltonian Operator can be proven using the Klein Gordon Lagrangian by applying the Euler-Lagrange equations, which relate the Lagrangian to the equations of motion. This results in the Hamiltonian operator, which represents the total energy of the system, being derived from the Lagrangian.

4. What is the significance of proving the Hamiltonian Operator in QFT with the Klein Gordon Lagrangian?

Proving the Hamiltonian Operator in QFT with the Klein Gordon Lagrangian is significant because it provides a deep understanding of the behavior of particles in quantum field theories. It also allows for the calculation of important quantities such as the energy spectrum and scattering amplitudes.

5. Are there any alternative methods for proving the Hamiltonian Operator in QFT?

Yes, there are alternative methods for proving the Hamiltonian Operator in QFT, such as using the path integral formalism or canonical quantization. However, the derivation using the Klein Gordon Lagrangian is a widely accepted and fundamental approach in understanding the Hamiltonian operator in QFT.

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
713
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
381
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
Back
Top