# Energy Problem

1. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Consider a simple frictionless roller coaster. It begins from rest at x = 0 at a height of y = H. Then it drops into a dip, reaching a minimum at x = 100, with zero height (y = 0). Finally, it goes back up and reaches the crest of a small hill of height y = H/2 at x = 200. What can you say about the kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy of the roller coaster during its trip? Assume that the zero level of potential energy is taken to be y = 0.

x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the gravitational PE equals the kinetic energy
x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the kinetic energy equals the TOTAL energy
x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the gravitational PE is a maximum
x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the kinetic energy is a minimum
x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the kinetic energy is a maximum
x = 0 x = 100 x = 200 this is where the gravitational PE is a minimum

My answers are in bold, unfortunetly the program doesnt tell me which ones i got wrong, only that i got the problem wrong, i feel im close to the answer but dont know which one is wrong.

Thanks

2. Jun 4, 2007

OK
OK

3. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

so the first one must be X=100 because PE and KE=0 at this point. I am still not sure what the second one is, i thought it was X=200, because its in motion but it says thats wrong.

4. Jun 4, 2007

### Delta

Energy is always conserved, so if there PE=0 at the bottom of the run, what is the KE?

Have another a look at your 5th and 6th answers for a clue.

5. Jun 4, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

How can they both be zero? That would mean the total energy is zero.
If KE = total energy, what must the PE be?

6. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

Zero, but im still unsure as to where PE would be zero, i thought it was at 100 but that doesnt seem to work...

7. Jun 4, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

Says who? PE is zero where y = 0.

8. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

so then would PE=KE=Total Energy? but i still dont see where PE would = KE,
Wait so at rest PE=KE=0=total energy at X=0 right? and gravitational PE= KE at X=100?

9. Jun 4, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

Not sure what you are saying here. PE + KE = Total Energy... always. So if PE = KE, then PE cannot also equal Total Energy (unless that's zero--not the case here).

If PE = KE, what must PE (and KE) be in terms of Total Energy?

10. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

So PE and KE would be the same in terms of total energy?

11. Jun 4, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

Analogy: If you and your brother have the same amount of money, how much do each of you have compared to the total?

12. Jun 4, 2007

### BMWPower06

oh okay, half. But, i still dont understand when KE would = total energy since PE cannot be zero.

13. Jun 5, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

Why in the world do you think that PE cannot be zero? The problem even states: