Solving for Height of a Falling Cube Using Kinetic Energy

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the velocity and height at which a cube loses contact with a half-sphere. The approach involves considering the balance of forces and using equations for conservation of energy and centripetal force. The final answer is determined to be 6.89 meters.
  • #1
goonking
434
3

Homework Statement


nVKXhyn.png


Homework Equations


1/2 mv^2 = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


first, a side question, if p = mv, can't we just place p into 1/2 mv^2 so it becomes 1/2 p^2?

anyway, on to the question, at the point where the cube falls off, the Fnormal should just about equal 0, correct?
is this the way to approach the problem? Or we can find the velocity where the cube loses contact with the sphere and plug that v into 1/2 mv^2 = mgh, solving for h.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
3. No you can't because there is only v square while m isn't.
Personally I would prefer to consider the balance of two force, gravity and centripetal, looking at which speed the mass can still move of a rotational motion.
 
  • #3
Pierce610 said:
3. No you can't because there is only v square while m isn't.
Personally I would prefer to consider the balance of two force, gravity and centripetal, looking at which speed the mass can still move of a rotational motion.
so at the point the cube loses contact with the half-sphere, acceleration becomes 9.8 m/s^2.

a = v^2/r

9.8 x 10.3m = v^2
v= 10.04 m/s

1/2 m v^2 = mgh
mass cancels out

1/2 (10.04)^2 = g h

h = 5.15 meters.

is that correct?
 
  • #4
goonking said:
so at the point the cube loses contact with the half-sphere, acceleration becomes 9.8 m/s^2.

a = v^2/r

9.8 x 10.3m = v^2
v= 10.04 m/s

1/2 m v^2 = mgh
mass cancels out

1/2 (10.04)^2 = g h

h = 5.15 meters.

is that correct?

When the ball will freely fall then it's total acceleration will be ##g##. You just need here radial acceleration.

ccc.png


If the block looses contact with the sphere then what can you say about the magnitude of Normal reaction force acting on the block.
If the block has velocity at ##v## at the instant shown then what should be the centripetal force acting on it? This centripetal force it provided by which force? Equate them and get the answer.
 
  • #5
Satvik Pandey said:
When the ball will freely fall then it's total acceleration will be ##g##. You just need here radial acceleration.

View attachment 80691

If the block looses contact with the sphere then what can you say about the magnitude of Normal reaction force acting on the block.
If the block has velocity at ##v## at the instant shown then what should be the centripetal force acting on it? This centripetal force it provided by which force? Equate them and get the answer.
Centripetal force is provided by Fnormal? which is 0 when it loses contact with the half-sphere.

correct?
 
  • #6
goonking said:
Centripetal force is provided by Fnormal? which is 0 when it loses contact with the half-sphere.

correct?

Yes Normal force will be zero when it looses contact. But centripetal force is provided by the component of mg. Can you find it?
 
  • #7
Satvik Pandey said:
Yes Normal force will be zero when it looses contact. But centripetal force is provided by the component of mg. Can you find it?
Centri. Force = m a

a = v^2/r = mg ?
 
  • #8
goonking said:
Centri. Force = m a

a = v^2/r = mg ?
I said a ##component## of mg. Can you find it in terms of mg and ##\theta##?
 
  • #9
it should be the hypotenuse in the picture, which is mg / cos theta

how do we solve for theta?
 
  • #10
goonking said:
it should be the hypotenuse in the picture, which is mg / cos theta

how do we solve for theta?

It will be ##mgcos\theta##

First equate this to centripetal force. You can find relation between ##v## and ##\theta## by conservation of energy.
 
  • #11
Satvik Pandey said:
It will be ##mgcos\theta##

First equate this to centripetal force. You can find relation between ##v## and ##\theta## by conservation of energy.

mgcosθ = m v^2 / rgcosθ = v^2/r

correct?
 
  • #12
goonking said:
mgcosθ = m v^2 / rgcosθ = v^2/r

correct?

Yes. Now use conservation of energy to find relation between v and theta.
 
  • #13
Satvik Pandey said:
Yes. Now use conservation of energy to find relation between v and theta.
conservation of energy = 1/2 mvi^2 + mghi = 1/2 mvf^2 + mghf ?
 
  • #14
goonking said:
conservation of energy = 1/2 mvi^2 + mghi = 1/2 mvf^2 + mghf ?

What is the initial velocity of the block?
Can you represent hi and hf in terms of R and theta?
 
  • #15
Satvik Pandey said:
What is the initial velocity of the block?
Can you represent hi and hf in terms of R and theta?
initial velocity should be 0 since it was at rest.

hi is 10.3m

hf is what we are looking for

and i have no idea how to find theta.
 
  • #16
.
 
  • #17
goonking said:
initial velocity should be 0 since it was at rest.

hi is 10.3m

hf is what we are looking for

and i have no idea how to find theta.

hf is ##Rcos\theta##. Now proceed.
 
  • #18
Satvik Pandey said:
hf is ##Rcos\theta##. Now proceed.
but we have 2 unknowns, hf and theta.
 
  • #19
goonking said:
but we have 2 unknowns, hf and theta.

##h_{f}=Rcos\theta##. Put this in energy equation. You would have two unknowns v and ##\theta##. Remember the equation which you made by using centripetal force. Use these two equation and find ##\theta##.:smile:
 
  • #20
Satvik Pandey said:
##h_{f}=Rcos\theta##. Put this in energy equation. You would have two unknowns v and ##\theta##. Remember the equation which you made by using centripetal force. Use these two equation and find ##\theta##.:smile:
is v = 14 m/s?
 
  • #21
goonking said:
is v = 14 m/s?

I think you have done some mistake. The equations are
##2mgR(1-cos\theta)=mv^{2}##

and ##Rgcos\theta=v^{2}##

Find ##\theta##. You don't have to find v.
 
  • #22
Satvik Pandey said:
I think you have done some mistake. The equations are
##2mgR(1-cos\theta)=mv^{2}##

and ##Rgcos\theta=v^{2}##

Find ##\theta##. You don't have to find v.
angle should be 48 degrees
 
  • #23
goonking said:
angle should be 48 degrees

Yes ##cos\theta=\frac{2}{3}##. From this can you find the height above which it looses contact with the ball?
 
  • #24
Satvik Pandey said:
Yes ##cos\theta=\frac{2}{3}##. From this can you find the height above which it looses contact with the ball?
6.89 m

thank you!
 
  • #25
goonking said:
6.89 m

thank you!

You are welcome!:smile:
 

1. How is kinetic energy used to solve for the height of a falling cube?

Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. In the case of a falling cube, the cube has kinetic energy because it is moving downward due to the force of gravity. This kinetic energy can be used to solve for the height of the cube using the formula: KE = mgh, where m is the mass of the cube, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the cube.

2. What information do I need to solve for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy?

In order to solve for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy, you will need to know the mass of the cube, the acceleration due to gravity (which is approximately 9.8 m/s² on Earth), and the kinetic energy of the cube at a specific point in its fall.

3. Can I use kinetic energy to solve for the height of a cube at any point in its fall?

Yes, you can use kinetic energy to solve for the height of a falling cube at any point in its fall as long as you have the necessary information (mass, acceleration due to gravity, and kinetic energy). However, the height calculated may not be accurate if there are other forces acting on the cube, such as air resistance.

4. What are some real-world applications of solving for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy?

Solving for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy can be applied in various scenarios, such as calculating the height of a falling object in physics experiments, determining the height of a cliff by measuring the kinetic energy of a dropped object, or estimating the height of a building by measuring the kinetic energy of a dropped object from the top.

5. Is solving for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy a precise method?

While solving for the height of a falling cube using kinetic energy can provide a good estimate, it may not always be completely accurate. Other factors such as air resistance, wind, and the shape of the object can affect the calculation. Additionally, this method assumes that all of the kinetic energy is converted into potential energy at the highest point of the object's fall, which may not always be the case. Therefore, it is important to use caution and consider other factors when using this method to solve for the height of a falling object.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
422
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
273
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
801
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
311
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
174
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
446
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
100
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
588
Back
Top