Where Does the Radiated Energy Come From in a Gravitational Collision?

In summary, the two massive bodies in open space, having zero relative velocity, and having the same space ambient temperature will eventually fall together and merge. The excess thermal energy will be radiated away, returning to the ambient state.
  • #1
dtfroedge
27
0
Presume there are two massive bodies in open space, having zero relative velocity, and having the same space ambient temperature. That is, the incoming and out-flowing black body radiation is balanced and the temperature is unchanging. Presume these bodies become gravitationally attracted, and fall together. On impact the temperature will rise, and then the excess thermal energy will be radiated away, returning to the ambient state. By both Newtonian and Relativistic mechanics, the total rest mass is equal to the sum of the rest mass of the two combined bodies. (Black Hole theory depends on it.)
The question is, from whence did the radiated energy come?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From the gravitational potential they had when in space.
This was converted to kinetic energy when they started to move towards each other.
The k.e. was converted into heat in the inelastic collision, and the heat was radiated away.
 
  • #3
This is certainly not my area of expertise and I am quite probably wrong, but it would seem that the kinetic energy of the bodies, built up as they fell toward each other through the force of gravity could be released as heat energy if this were considered a partially inelastic collision. It's a good question, and I'd love to be corrected on this if I'm wrong...
 
  • #4
Update: Stonebridge, you beat me to it, but at least it looks as if I was thinking along the correct lines...
 
  • #5
I should have added that some of the (kinetic) energy could have been used to deform the masses when they merged; depending on how they actually did that. So that the original source was the gravitational p.e. - though it won't have all been converted into the radiated energy. There would be some losses on the way!
 
  • #6
Remember, any energy associated with the gravitational field is part of the mass, and is all accounted for after the particles are merged.
 
  • #7
dtfroedge said:
Remember, any energy associated with the gravitational field is part of the mass, and is all accounted for after the particles are merged.
I don't see a question in there (and it doesn't sound right anyway...)...what are you getting at?
 
  • #8
There was a quantity of energy radiated away, yet the entire e=mc^2 is still there
 
  • #9
dtfroedge said:
the total rest mass is equal to the sum of the rest mass of the two combined bodies.
dtfroedge said:
Remember, any energy associated with the gravitational field is part of the mass, and is all accounted for after the particles are merged.
dtfroedge said:
There was a quantity of energy radiated away, yet the entire e=mc^2 is still there
Actually, all of this is incorrect. The mass of any bound system is always less than the mass of the unbound constituents. This is called the "mass deficit" and is related to the binding energy of the system. It is really only significant for nuclear binding, but it applies to the other forces also. Your specific scenario is described in the 3rd paragraph in the Mass Deficit section of the Wikipedia article on Binding Energy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_energy
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
Actually, all of this is incorrect. The mass of any bound system is always less than the mass [/url]

DaleSpam
You're right, very good.
 
  • #11
I am impatiently waiting for a point here, dtfroedge.
 

1. What is an "Energy Thought Experiment"?

An "Energy Thought Experiment" is a hypothetical scenario used by scientists to explore the behavior and properties of energy in different situations. It involves using imagination and logical reasoning to predict the outcome of a scenario without performing an actual experiment.

2. How is an "Energy Thought Experiment" different from a regular experiment?

An "Energy Thought Experiment" does not involve any physical materials or equipment, unlike a regular experiment. It relies solely on the scientist's ability to imagine and predict the behavior of energy in a given scenario.

3. What are the benefits of conducting an "Energy Thought Experiment"?

Conducting an "Energy Thought Experiment" allows scientists to explore and test complex ideas and theories without the limitations of physical experiments. It also helps in developing critical thinking skills and can lead to new discoveries and advancements in the field of energy.

4. Can "Energy Thought Experiments" be used in different fields of science?

Yes, "Energy Thought Experiments" can be applied to various fields of science, including physics, chemistry, and biology. It is a useful tool for understanding the behavior of energy in different systems and can provide valuable insights and predictions.

5. How do scientists validate the results of an "Energy Thought Experiment"?

Scientists can validate the results of an "Energy Thought Experiment" by comparing them with the results of actual experiments or observations. If the predictions made in the thought experiment align with the real-world outcomes, it can be considered a successful and reliable experiment.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
573
Replies
1
Views
240
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
645
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
583
Back
Top