Engineering physics problem help

In summary, a rock is thrown from the roof of a building, with an initial velocity of 10 m/s at an angle of 30 degrees above the horizonal. The rock is observed to strike the ground 43 m from the base of the building.
  • #1
sirfederation
20
0
1. A rock is thrown from the roof of a building, with an initial velocity of 10 m/s at an angle of 30 degrees above the horizonal. The rock is observed to strike the ground 43 m from the base of the building. What is the height of the building?


This is what I did:
First I set my origin at the top of the building so the height would be in the negative direction
Vxi = 10 cos 30 = 8.66 m/s
Vyi = 10 sin 30 =5 m/s

Xxf - Xxi = 1/2( Vi-Vf)T
43-0 = 1/2 (8.66 + 8.66)T
43 = 8.66T
4.97 s = T

Vyf = 5 m/s -(9.8 m/s^2)(4.97s)
Vyf = -43.61 m/s

Yf-Yi = 1/2(Vi + Vf)T
Yf = 1/2(5 -43.61)4.96
Yf = -95.75 m

What I was wondering is if I found Time which is T and the height correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm having a hard time reading what you wrote there, but maybe this will give you what you need:

yf - yi = vyi*t + (1/2)at2

Just remember that your vyi is positive and a is negative.
 
  • #3
Code:
Well I split everything up into horizontal and vertical componants, so first I will deal with the horizontal:

u = 10 Cos30 ms^-1
v = v
a = 0
s = 43 m
t = t

find the time taken (t) for the rock to travel 43m horizontally:

s = ut + 1/2 a t^2

43 = 10 t Cos30

43 = 5 ([squ]3) t

t  = 8.6 ([squ]3)

t  = 4.97 s


And now the vertical:

Then find out how far something can fall due to gravity in 4.97 s

u = 10 Sin60 = 5 ms^-1
v = v
a = 9.81 ms^-2
s = s
t = 4.97 s

s = ut + 0.5at^2

s = 5 * 4.97 + 0.5 * 9.81 * 4.97^2

s = 146 m
I'm not saying that what I've done is 100% correct, I could have made a silly error or something. And I'm not saying that you should do it this way, if you've been taught another way, do it like that if you feel more comfortable with it.
We get the same answer for the time of the drop, so it looks as though you made an error in one of the calculations after that but I haven't checked your working so I don't know.
 
  • #4
Wouldn't the acceleration be -9.8 m/s^2 in lavalamps reply which would come out to -95.77
 
  • #5
I took the downward direction as positive (maybe I should have mentioned that). That way, the value attained for s is actually the distance from the top of the building to the bottom of the building.
 
  • #6
Xxf - Xxi = 1/2( Vi-Vf)T
43-0 = 1/2 (8.66 + 8.66)T
43 = 8.66T
4.97 s = T

This is incorrect. You are assuming that Vf= -Vi. If you were looking at vertical motion, and that you were looking at the same height both times, yes, the final velocity (down) would be the same as the initial (up) but in the opposite direction. Here, the speed horizontaly is a constant because there is no horizontal force.
You want Xxf- Xxi= Vi(T).

Using that value with what you did after that should give you the right answer.+
 
  • #7
so if xxf-xxi=(Vi)T
43m-0 = 10(m/s)T
4.3s = T

Then I plug it into the equation: yyf-yyi= Vyi(T)+(1/2)(Ay)(T)^2

yyf= 5(4.3)+(1/2)(-9.8)(4.3)^2
yyf =21.5-90.6
yyf=-69.1 m

I set my origin at the top of the building. Is this what it would come out to?
 
  • #8
If you set your origin to the top of the building (like I did) then it would make sense to take the downward direction as positive (like I did). I would have thought that getting a negative answer would a dead give-away as a wrong answer.
 
  • #9
I am posting the correct answer which is indeed -96 meters or 96 meters (determined by where you set your origin).
 

1. What is engineering physics?

Engineering physics is a branch of science that combines principles of physics and engineering to solve complex problems and design innovative solutions in various fields, such as aerospace, mechanical, electrical, and materials engineering.

2. How can engineering physics help me with problem-solving?

Engineering physics provides a strong foundation in both physics and engineering principles, allowing you to approach problems from a multidisciplinary perspective. This can help you think critically and creatively to come up with effective solutions.

3. What types of problems can engineering physics help to solve?

Engineering physics can help solve a wide range of problems, including those related to energy, materials, mechanics, and electronics. For example, it can be used to design sustainable energy systems, develop new materials for use in manufacturing, and optimize the performance of electronic devices.

4. Do I need a strong background in math to study engineering physics?

Yes, a strong foundation in mathematics is essential for studying engineering physics. You will need to be comfortable with calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra, among other math concepts.

5. What career opportunities are available for those with a degree in engineering physics?

Graduates with a degree in engineering physics can pursue a variety of career paths, including working as engineers, researchers, or consultants in various industries such as aerospace, energy, and electronics. They can also choose to pursue further studies in areas such as materials science, nanotechnology, or renewable energy.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
697
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
644
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
746
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
684
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
Back
Top