Makes sense, but recently editors in Elsevier changed my "the Newton second law" into "the Newton’s second law". Are they wrong?Nidum said:Grammatically should be
' the Einstein equation ' or ' Einstein's equation ' .
' the Newton laws ' or ' Newton's laws '
If referring to a specific law of the set then :
' the second Newton law ' or ' Newton's second law ' or ' the second of Newton's laws ' .
Both look wrong to me. Either "Newton's second law" or "the second Newton law". The first is more usual. My impression is that custom dictates "Smith's law" and "the Smith equation", but I don't know if anyone has made this an official rule.Demystifier said:recently editors in Elsevier changed my "the Newton second law" into "the Newton’s second law". Are they wrong?
Proper English grammar is crucial in physics as it allows for clear and precise communication of ideas and concepts. Inaccurate or incorrect grammar can lead to misunderstandings and errors in calculations.
Some common grammatical mistakes made by scientists in physics include using incorrect verb tenses, subject-verb agreement errors, and misuse of punctuation.
One way to improve your English grammar in physics is to practice writing and speaking in English regularly. It is also helpful to read scientific papers and articles written by native English speakers to learn proper grammar usage in the field of physics.
While technical jargon and complex sentence structures may be common in scientific writing, it is not necessary to use them. It is important to prioritize clarity and simplicity in communication, so using simpler language and sentence structures may be more effective in conveying your ideas.
Yes, abbreviations and acronyms can be used in scientific writing, but they should be defined and introduced to readers before being used. It is also best to avoid using too many abbreviations and acronyms as it can make the writing more difficult to understand.