- #1

- 13,292

- 5,702

**'s**equation? Newton law or Newton

**'s**law? Allegedly the correct answers are Einstein equation and Newton's law, but that doesn't seem logical to me. What is the general rule?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Demystifier
- Start date

- #1

- 13,292

- 5,702

- #2

Nidum

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,992

- 852

Grammatically should be

'* the* Einstein equation ' or ' Einstein's equation ' .

'*the* Newton laws ' or ' Newton's laws '

If referring to a specific law of the set then :

'*the *second Newton law ' or ' Newton's second law ' or ' *the *second *of* Newton's laws ' .

'

'

If referring to a specific law of the set then :

'

Last edited:

- #3

- 13,292

- 5,702

Makes sense, but recently editors in Elsevier changed my "the Newton second law" into "the Newton’s second law". Are they wrong?Grammatically should be

'theEinstein equation ' or ' Einstein's equation ' .

'theNewton laws ' or ' Newton's laws '

If referring to a specific law of the set then :

'thesecond Newton law ' or ' Newton's second law ' or 'thesecondofNewton's laws ' .

- #4

Nidum

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,992

- 852

Yes - they are wrong .

English grammar mostly works like mathematics .

The (second ( Newton's ( law ))) is not the same as The ( Newton's ( second ( law )))

The first construction means that you refer to Newton's laws and specifically to the second one . This is clear and correct .

The other construction actually means that you refer to second laws and specifically to Newton's one . At best bad grammar but in a more complex reference could cause multiple ambiguities .

English grammar mostly works like mathematics .

The (second ( Newton's ( law ))) is not the same as The ( Newton's ( second ( law )))

The first construction means that you refer to Newton's laws and specifically to the second one . This is clear and correct .

The other construction actually means that you refer to second laws and specifically to Newton's one . At best bad grammar but in a more complex reference could cause multiple ambiguities .

Last edited:

- #5

mjc123

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 1,283

- 688

Both look wrong to me. Either "Newton's second law" or "the second Newton law". The first is more usual. My impression is that custom dictates "Smith's law" and "the Smith equation", but I don't know if anyone has made this an official rule.recently editors in Elsevier changed my "the Newton second law" into "the Newton’s second law". Are they wrong?

To me, "the second Newton law" implies the second of Newton's laws (as distinct from the first or third); "the Newton second law" implies Newton's second law, as opposed to anyone else's second law (e.g. Mr. Thermodynamics). Or even a law about a quantity with units of N s.

It is definitely bad grammar to put the definite article before an individual's proper name in the genitive. The only example I can immediately think of is "the Young's modulus", which is common usage.

- #6

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Education Advisor

- 29,588

- 15,040

- #7

- 23,780

- 15,390

Green's windmill:

Green windmill:

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 334

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 457

- Replies
- 103

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 887

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 550

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 370

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 390

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 506

- Last Post

- Replies
- 24

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 681