Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Entropy to the max

  1. Jan 9, 2006 #1
    entropy must go up right?
    so if you had a room full of hydrogen, would it eventually fusion into hot iron?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 9, 2006 #2

    G01

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If entropy goes up, that does not mean tempurature goes up. More entropy does not mean more energy. (Which would be needed to fuse hydrogen into anything heavier.)
     
  4. Jan 9, 2006 #3
    isnt the heat just to speed up the fusion?
    wouldnt it fusion by itself if you gave it enough time?
     
  5. Jan 9, 2006 #4
    Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of the system. Greater the randomness in a system greater the entropy is.....
    Gas > Liquid > Solid
    Also,
    dS = Q/T
    dS = Change in entropy of a system
    Q = heat absorbed by a system in a reversable process
    T = temprature of the system
    And now, If you have a room (system) full of hydrogen and entropy is always be increasing - simply implies that the temprature of the system is going down.
     
  6. Jan 9, 2006 #5

    G01

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Any closed system increases entropy with an increase in time. This means the system will proceed towards a state of maximum disorder. In this case maximum disorder means the whole body of gas(the system) will seek an equilibrium temperature and stay there. These hydrogen atoms will not fuse if this equilibrium tempurature is one obtainable on earth. In order for hydrogen to fuse the atoms must have enough energy to overcome the repulsion between them. In my understanding (I'm no expert now) fusion has nothing to do with entropy. Maybe someone more learned in the subject can help you better than I can.
     
  7. Jan 9, 2006 #6
    NO, actually heat provides atom of -lets say- hydrogen with enough energy to collide with other hydrogen atom in order to fuse together.

    And fusion would not start by itself, i think my earlier post must hav e made it clear.
     
  8. Jan 9, 2006 #7
    It is not a question that can be answered by thermodynamics alone. It is like asking - suppose you have a gas contained on one side of a container by a wall, will the gas eventually expand to the other side of the wall? Clearly the entropy would increase if the gas were to expand so this process is favored by the second law. But you have the wall in the way, so common experience says that the gas will not expand to the other side. But then of course you have quantum tunneling wich allows for a particle to pass through the wall with an extremely tiny probability. This means that after an extremely long time you would find the gas to have expanded. For practical purposes, though, you could say the gas never expands.

    Now when it comes to this fusion buisiness I think it is clear that the entropy will increase upon fusion. What people seem to be forgetting is that the second law deals with the entropy of the universe. This is why processes like freezing can be spontaneous. If you have some system at constant pressure in thermal contact with its surroundings then the entropy change that occurs in the surroundings due to processes in the system is equal to minus the entalpy of the process. Obviously nuclear fusion of two hydrogen atoms is a highly exothermic process with a massive negative enthalpy value.

    So the question is- is fusion possible at all at room temperature? Thermodynamics is silent on this issue. Thermodynamics only distinguishes between allowable and non-allowable processes without saying which of the allowable processes will actually occur or at what rate. Nuclear physics really is ouside my expertise, and I don't know whether it is really possible for nuclear fusion to occur at room temperatures. I would venture to guess, though, that is possible, but extraordinarily unlikely. I guess this because the Boltzman distribution tells us how energy state are distributed in a system in equillibrium. Hypothetically there are some particles in every state if the system is large enough and the temperature is not 0. This means that there are gas molecules at room T with the same kinetic energy as the average particles on the sun. So hypothetically, there is an outside chance of a collision between two such molecules that results in fusion. If this is true, then thermodynamics says that the rate of the fusion reation will exceed the rate of the reverse reaction up until there is a very high concentration of fused nuclie, so that eventually you would have very little hydrogen left. But we are talking about astronomical time scales here- there is still a lot of hydrogen left in the sun and it is at a much higher temperature and haas been around for billions of years. Since most of the hydrogen that is around now has probably been at higher than room temperature for most of its existence, I think the time scale we are talking about is longer than the age of the universe itself!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Entropy to the max
  1. Entropy principle (Replies: 4)

  2. Entropy and temperature (Replies: 15)

Loading...