- #1

- 1

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter imram.math
- Start date

- #1

- 1

- 0

- #2

- 17,578

- 8,571

In this case it reads:

A function [itex]f:D \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous at [itex]x_0 \in D[/itex] iff for any [itex]\epsilon>0[/itex] there exists a [itex]\delta>0[/itex] such that for all [itex]x \in D[/itex] with [itex]|x-x_0|<\delta[/itex]

[tex]|f(x)-f(x_0)|<\epsilon.[/tex]

This just says in a formal way that the graph of the function doesn't jump at [itex](x_0,f(x_0))[/itex].

- #3

pwsnafu

Science Advisor

- 1,080

- 85

##0<|x-x_0|<\delta## actually.

- #4

WannabeNewton

Science Advisor

- 5,800

- 536

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=700787

- #5

- 3,473

- 255

There's no reason to exclude the point ##x = x_0##. We trivially have ##|f(x_0) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon## for any ##\epsilon##.##0<|x-x_0|<\delta## actually.

- #6

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 134

There's no reason to exclude the point ##x = x_0##. We trivially have ##|f(x_0) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon## for any ##\epsilon##.

It sure is a reason.

Otherwise, discontinuous functions would be deprived of limit values at the point of discontinuity. Thus, the limit concept would be conflated with the continuity concept.

Think about it!

- #7

- 3,473

- 255

It sure is a reason.

Otherwise, discontinuous functions would be deprived of limit values at the point of discontinuity. Thus, the limit concept would be conflated with the continuity concept.

Think about it!

But vanhees71 was giving the definition of continuity at ##x_0##, not the definition of the existence of a limit at ##x_0##. If the function is to be continuous at ##x_0##, then it must be defined at ##x_0## and have the correct value!

- #8

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 134

Hmm..no read it again.But vanhees71 was giving the definition of continuity at ##x_0##, not the definition of the existence of a limit at ##x_0##. If the function is to be continuous at ##x_0##, then it must be defined at ##x_0## and have the correct value!

What he posted was the definition in terms of the LIMIT concept in which L=f(x_0).

In particular, he writes d>0

- #9

- 3,473

- 255

One more remark and then I'll shut up. :tongue: Here's a discussion from Spivak'sHmm..no read it again.

What he posted was the definition in terms of the LIMIT concept in which L=f(x_0).

In particular, he writes d>0

Spivak said:If we translate the equation ##\lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) = f(a)## according to the definition of limits, we obtain:

For every ##\epsilon > 0## there is a ##\delta > 0## such that, for all ##x##, if ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##, then ##|f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon##.

But in this case, where the limit is ##f(a)##, the phrase ##0 < |x-a| < \delta## may be changed to the simpler condition ##|x-a| < \delta##, since if ##x = a## it is certainly true that ##|f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon##.

- #10

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 134

Why change a perfectly good criterion for continuity?

Share: