1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Epsilon-delta proofs?

  1. Aug 12, 2007 #1
    Can the epsilon associated with f(x) be a function of x?

    i.e epsilon = delta * (x-2)^2 valid?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 12, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    No. It shouldn't be function of x.
  4. Aug 12, 2007 #3
    Can it be a function of anything?
  5. Aug 12, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    What are you talking about??
    Your question is extremely vague.
  6. Aug 12, 2007 #5
    No! it shouldn't be function of anything because it's an ARBITRARY POSITIVE REAL NUMBER ( as such it must be different from 0). When you do an epsilon -- delta proof you must prove that, given an epsilon , which you don't know anything of, some in/equality holds whenever your variable ( x) satisfies some restriction ( i.e. |x-a|< [tex]\delta[/tex])
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2007
  7. Aug 12, 2007 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    [itex]\epsilon[/itex] and [itex]\delta[/itex] are constants and, as
    Super Leunam said, can't depend on anything. However, in most proofs you are given [itex]\epsilon[/itex] (you can't control its value) and must find a correct [itex]\delta[/itex] for that [itex]\epsilon[/itex]. In that sense, [itex]\delta[/itex] may depend on [itex]\epsilon[/itex].
  8. Aug 12, 2007 #7
    Unless by [tex]x[/tex] the poster means a specific point [tex]x_0[/tex].

    So for example if you want to show [tex]f(x)[/tex] is continous at every single point [tex]x_0[/tex] and you end up with [tex]\delta = x_0\epsilon[/tex], then that is okay.
  9. Aug 12, 2007 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Like Kummer said.

    If you want to prove continuity at a point x_0, then your expression for [itex]\delta(\epsilon)[/itex] may depend on x_0 too: [itex]\delta(\epsilon, x_0)[/itex]. And sometimes, like in the proof of the chain rule I think, it becomes necessary to specify that a number delta is the delta associated with epsilon, and x_0 and of the function f, and in that end, we shall write [itex]\delta(\epsilon, x_0, f)[/itex].

    Moreover, if a function is continuous on [a,b] say, then it means that given epsilon>0, there is a delta for every x in [a,b] and [itex]\delta(\epsilon, x)[/itex] can be seen as a function sending x in [a,b] to a such proper delta. And if that [itex]\delta(\epsilon, x)[/itex] function can be arranged to be constant over [a,b] (i.e. independant of x), this is when we say that f is uniformly continuous on [a,b].
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Epsilon-delta proofs?
  1. Delta Epsilon Proofs (Replies: 2)

  2. Delta-Epsilon Proofs (Replies: 1)