- #1
Daniiel
- 123
- 0
Hey
this is a pretty straight forward equation derivation, but when i do it and compare it to the solutions, mine is different to theirs.
The equation is
[PLAIN]http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/9790/ddaaad.jpg where n1=1
for a concave lens (fish in a fish bowl) so r is negative
solving for i
they get, r/(n2+1)
and i get n2r/(n2+1)
there answer seems right for the question, but I am just not sure how they canceled the n2
this is a pretty straight forward equation derivation, but when i do it and compare it to the solutions, mine is different to theirs.
The equation is
[PLAIN]http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/9790/ddaaad.jpg where n1=1
for a concave lens (fish in a fish bowl) so r is negative
solving for i
they get, r/(n2+1)
and i get n2r/(n2+1)
there answer seems right for the question, but I am just not sure how they canceled the n2
Last edited by a moderator: