1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Equilibrium and Electrons (I have the answer, need to know how to do it)

  1. Nov 29, 2004 #1
    I have the answer to this question... but I need to know mathematically how to solve it.

    Q: An electron is released above the Earth's surface. A second electron directly below it exerts just enough of an electric force on the first electron to cancel the gravitational force on it. Find the distance between the two electrons.

    A: 5.07 m
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 29, 2004 #2
    I would know how to solve it if I were given numerical values (I've done three equilibrium problems on my homework, all with numbers, and I solved them without any problems).

    The formulas:

    Fe = (8.99 x 10^9)(q1)(q2)/ d^2

    Fg = (6.67 x 10^-11)(m1)(m2)/ d^2
     
  4. Nov 29, 2004 #3
    the charge for an electron is a fundamental constant look it up in your textbook it is around 1.6 x 10^-19 Coulombs and the mass of the electron is also a fundamental constant which is 9.11 x 10^-31 kg
     
  5. Nov 29, 2004 #4
    I did that... but the answer I got was well over 1000 m
     
  6. Nov 29, 2004 #5
    Here is what I did... maybe you could tell me where I went wrong:

    (8.99 x 10^9)(1.6 x 10^-9)^2 / x^2
    =
    (6.67 x 10^-11)(9.109 x 10^-31)^2 / x^2
     
  7. Nov 29, 2004 #6
    Whoops... I put 9 instead on 19.

    Let me try that again...
     
  8. Nov 29, 2004 #7
    Nope... still got a number much bigger than 5
     
  9. Nov 29, 2004 #8
    Am I not supposed to square the charge and mass values?
     
  10. Nov 29, 2004 #9
    Ok... tried not squaring them... still a huge number
     
  11. Nov 29, 2004 #10
    Anyone out there have any ideas?
     
  12. Nov 29, 2004 #11

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Make it a habit to solve all of your problems symbolically. When you have a symbolic solution, then plug in numbers.

    individually your equations are correct. BUT, is the d in the gravity equation the same as the d in Columbs equation? What are the 2 masses in the gravity equation?

    I would write the equations

    [tex] F_c = K \frac {q_e^2} {d^2} [/tex]
    and
    [tex] F_g = G \frac {m_e M_E} {{(R_e + D +d)}^2}[/tex]

    Where Fc = Coulmb force
    Fg = Gravitational force
    qe= electron charge
    me= mass of the electron
    ME= Mass of the Earth
    Re=Radius of the earth
    D is the distance above the earth
    d is the distance between the electrons

    K and G are the respective force constants.
    edit: added parens in the denominator of the gravitional equation.

    Now set the forces equal and solve for d.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2004
  13. Nov 29, 2004 #12
    I have never seen the second equation in my life... & I have no idea how to use it.

    I'm only supposed to use the two equations I've been using.

    & I assume the distances are the same because I have no idea what they could be.
     
  14. Nov 29, 2004 #13
    & about the masses... again I have no idea. I copied the question exactly from my book.

    All we learned in this unit so far is stuff like three particles, each has a different charge (which you know), you know the distances of two of them, what is the third distance.
     
  15. Nov 29, 2004 #14
    Anyone else have any ideas?
     
  16. Nov 29, 2004 #15

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Sure you have, that is simply the distance from the center of the earth to your second electron.

    Trouble, we do not know D, the distance of the lower electron from the surface of the earth. Assume it to be zero or nearly so if you need a numerical solution. You also may be able to neglect the d (distance between the electrons) in the gravitational equation.
     
  17. Nov 29, 2004 #16

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You can find the distance at which the gravitational force of 2 electrons is equal to the Coulomb force, but it is when r = [itex] \infty [/itex]

    You need to find the balance between the EARTHS gravitational field and the Coulomb field of the electrons.
     
  18. Nov 30, 2004 #17
    And what about the gravitational force between the two electrons? Shouldn't it be considered?
     
  19. Dec 2, 2004 #18

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I am going to finish this problem. Just because.
    we have:
    Major edit! I am redefining D to be the distance to the upper electron instead of the lower, this removes the extra d greatly simplifing the expression.

    [tex] F_c = K \frac {q_e^2} {d^2} = F_g = G \frac {m_e M_E} {{(R_e + D )}^2}[/tex]

    We need to isolate d,

    [tex]d^2 = \frac {K q_e^2 (R_E + D )^2} {G M_E m_e}[/tex]

    [tex] d = q_e (R_E+D) \sqrt {\frac {K} {G M_E m_e} } [/tex]


    If we neglect the gravitational force between the electrons and assume that we are near the earths surface this simplifies a to.

    [tex] d = q_e R_E \sqrt {\frac {K} {G M_E m_e} } [/tex]

    Pluging in the numerical values yields d=5.07m
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2004
  20. Dec 2, 2004 #19
    good idea I will try it
     
  21. Dec 2, 2004 #20

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I ran out of the time this morning let me explain a little better the effects of D.

    [tex] d = (R_E +D) \sqrt {\frac {K} {G M_E m_e} }[/tex]


    So here we have an expression for the distance between 2 electrons in gravitational equilibrium with the Coulomb forces of the lower electron which is D m above the earths surface balancing the earths gravitational force on the upper electron. It is clear that as D increases the distance between the electrons will increase. Given this expression you can find the separation at any given distance above the earths surface, you will find that you will need more then 3 significant digits for D < 104m. By setting D=0 we find a minimum separation. Which corresponds to the given result.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2004
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?