Equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction

In summary: Delta r \Delta \thetaThe third component is the change in the normal stress in the tangential direction, which is given by \Delta \sigma_{\theta \theta}. This change is also multiplied by the area over which it acts, which is \Delta r \Delta \theta. So, the third term in the equilibrium equation is:\Delta \sigma_{\theta \theta} \Delta r \Delta \thetaThe fourth component is the change in the shear stress in the tangential direction, which is given by \Delta \tau_{r \theta}. This change is also multiplied by the area over which it acts, which is \Delta r \Delta \theta
  • #1
roldy
237
2

Homework Statement


Derive the differential equilibrium equation in the tangential direction [itex]\theta[/itex]


Homework Equations


[itex]\sum F_\theta = 0[/itex]

[itex]V = 1/2(2r + \Delta r)\Delta r \Delta \theta[/itex]

Small angle approximation:
[itex]
\cos(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}) = 1
[/itex]

[itex]
\sin(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}) = \frac{\Delta \theta}{2}
[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]
(\sigma_{\theta \theta} + \Delta \sigma_{\theta \theta})\cos(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2})\Delta r(1) - \sigma_{\theta \theta}\cos(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2})\Delta r(1) + (\sigma_{r\theta} + \Delta \sigma_{r\theta})\sin(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2})\Delta r(1) - \sigma_{r\theta}\sin(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2})\Delta r(1) + (\sigma_{r\theta} + \Delta\sigma_{r\theta})(r + \Delta r)\Delta \theta - \sigma_{r\theta}r\Delta \theta + \Theta V = 0
[/itex]

Simplifying:
[itex]
\Delta \sigma_{\theta \theta} \Delta r + \Delta \sigma_{r \theta} \frac{\Delta \theta}{2} \Delta r + \sigma_{r \theta} \Delta r \Delta \theta + \Delta \sigma_{r \theta} r \Delta \theta + \Delta \sigma_{r \theta}\Delta r \Delta \theta + 1/2\Theta(2r + \Delta r)\Delta r \Delta \theta = 0
[/itex]


Divide by [itex]\Delta r \Delta \theta[/itex]

[itex]
\frac{\Delta \sigma_{\theta \theta}}{\Delta \theta} + \frac{\Delta \sigma_{r \theta}}{2} + \sigma_{r \theta} + \frac{\Delta \sigma_{r \theta}r}{\Delta r} + \Delta \sigma_{r \theta} + 1/2\Theta(2r + \Delta r) = 0
[/itex]

Take the limit as [itex] \Delta r[/itex] approaches 0 and [itex]\Delta \theta[/itex] approaches 0

[itex]
\frac{\partial \sigma_{\theta \theta}}{\partial \theta} + (?) + \sigma_{r \theta} + \frac{\partial \sigma_{r \theta}r}{\partial r} + (?) + r\Theta = 0
[/itex]

[itex]
\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial \sigma_{\theta \theta}}{\partial \theta} + \frac{1}{r}(?) + \frac{1}{r} \sigma_{r \theta} + \frac{\partial \sigma_{r \theta}}{\partial r} + \frac{1}{r}(?) + \Theta = 0
[/itex]

I searched online for the correction equation and it is as follows:

[itex]
\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial \sigma_{\theta \theta}}{\partial \theta} + \frac{\partial \sigma_{r \theta}}{\partial r} + \frac{2\sigma_{r \theta}}{r} + \Theta = 0
[/itex]

I'm not sure what to do about the terms with no [itex]\Delta[/itex] in the denominator when I take the limit. Attached is the figure I'm working from.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.pdf
    285.8 KB · Views: 175
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for posting your question on the derivation of the differential equilibrium equation in the tangential direction. I have reviewed your attempt at the solution and would like to offer some corrections and clarifications.

Firstly, in your attempt, you have used the small angle approximation for both \cos(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}) and \sin(\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}). However, this is not necessary as the small angle approximation is typically used when the angle is very small, which is not the case in this problem. It is also important to note that in this problem, we are dealing with a differential equation and not a static equilibrium equation, so the small angle approximation is not applicable.

Secondly, in your attempt, you have used the symbol \sigma to represent the normal stress and \sigma_{r \theta} to represent the shear stress. However, in the context of this problem, it is more appropriate to use the symbols \sigma_{\theta \theta} for the normal stress and \tau_{r \theta} for the shear stress. This is because we are dealing with stresses in the tangential direction (\theta direction) and not in the radial direction (r direction).

Now, let's move on to the actual derivation of the differential equilibrium equation in the tangential direction. The first step is to write the equilibrium equation in the tangential direction, which is given by:

\sum F_\theta = 0

This equation states that the sum of all the forces acting in the tangential direction must equal zero for the body to be in equilibrium. Now, let's break this equation down into its components.

The first component is the normal stress acting in the tangential direction, which is given by \sigma_{\theta \theta}. This stress is multiplied by the area over which it acts, which is \Delta r \Delta \theta. So, the first term in the equilibrium equation is:

\sigma_{\theta \theta} \Delta r \Delta \theta

The second component is the shear stress acting in the tangential direction, which is given by \tau_{r \theta}. This stress is also multiplied by the area over which it acts, which is \Delta r \Delta \theta. However, we need to take into account the fact that the shear stress acts over two surfaces, so we need to multiply it by 2. So, the second term in the equilibrium equation is
 

1. What is the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction?

The equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction states that the sum of all forces acting in the tangential direction on an object must equal zero. This means that the forces pushing or pulling the object in different directions must be balanced in order for the object to remain in a state of equilibrium.

2. How is the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction used in physics?

The equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction is used in physics to analyze the motion of objects in rotational equilibrium. It helps to determine the force acting on an object in order to maintain its rotational equilibrium.

3. Can the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction be applied to objects in linear motion?

Yes, the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction can also be applied to objects in linear motion. In this case, it is used to determine the net force acting on an object in order to maintain its linear equilibrium.

4. What are some common examples of the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction?

Some common examples of the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction include a see-saw, a balance scale, and a spinning top. In all of these cases, the forces acting on the object must be balanced in order for it to remain in a state of equilibrium.

5. How does the equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction relate to Newton's first law of motion?

The equilibrium equation for forces in tangential direction is related to Newton's first law of motion, also known as the law of inertia. This law states that an object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will continue in motion at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. The equilibrium equation ensures that the forces acting on an object are balanced, thus maintaining its state of equilibrium and following Newton's first law of motion.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
555
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
875
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
382
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
873
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
987
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
825
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top