1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Equipotential surfaces

  1. Sep 8, 2006 #1
    Problem:

    A given system has the equipotential surfaces shown below, where Vo = 12.0 V.

    [​IMG]

    (a) What are the magnitude and direction of the electric field?
    (b) What is the shortest distance one can move to undergo a change in potential of 5.00 V?

    I am not too sure on what equations I can use to solve this, but I have a feeling one of them will be delta V = -W/qo, and I have no other ideas on how to approach this problem.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 9, 2006 #2
    You need trig to figure out the distance between the equipotentials. The electric field is always going to be orthogonal to equipotential surfaces. Do you know the relationship between E, V and r? Use that to find E, then use the E that you got from part a) for the last part.
     
  4. Sep 9, 2006 #3
    Okay, so for part (a), I use E = - V/r = - 12/4 = -3? Did I interpret your post correctly?
     
  5. Sep 9, 2006 #4
    Not quite, you need the distance between two equipotential lines, which would be along a line perpendicular to them. I think you've gone along the x axis, which is at an angle to the red lines. Use the triangle formed by the x and y axes and the line V=V0, split it into two smaller right angled triangles and look for similar angles.
     
  6. Sep 9, 2006 #5
    Okay, I determined how to split the triangle into two smaller right triangles and found the smiliar angles, but what exactly is this telling me?
     
  7. Sep 9, 2006 #6
    You should be able to get the distance between the equipotentials, which is your r in E=-V/r. Also, one of the angles gives you the direction of the E field.
     
  8. Sep 9, 2006 #7
    Oh, okay, so the distance between the lines is 1.78885 m, so this is my r. So plugging this into E = -V/r = -12/1.78885 = -6.7082 V/m?

    Edit: I just tried submitting this answer (both negative and positive), and both were incorrect.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2006
  9. Sep 10, 2006 #8
    That's odd, that's the answer I got. Have you added the direction? Does it say how many s.f. to give?
     
  10. Sep 10, 2006 #9
    I found my mistake. The units in the chart are in cm, so I converted all values into m. This gave me a value of 670.82, which is a correct answer. I also calculated the correct answer for the direction, which is 243 degrees counterclockwise from the +x axis. I also solved part (b). Thank you for your help!
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2006
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?