(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Let [itex]1\leq s<r<\infty[/itex]. For what pairs [itex]s,r[/itex] the norms [itex]\left\|\cdot\right\|_{s},\left\|\cdot\right\|_{r}[/itex] are equivalent?

2. Relevant equations

I have already proven that [itex]\left\|\cdot\right\|_{s}\leq (b-a)^{\frac{r-s}{rs}}\left\|\cdot\right\|_{r}[/itex] and that [itex]\left\|\cdot\right\|_{s}\leq (b-a)^{\frac{1}{s}}\left\|\cdot\right\|_{\infty}[/itex]. Of course I have proven, exposing that

[itex]

x_{k}(t)=\begin{cases}

1-kt &0\leq t\leq\frac{1}{k}\\

0 &\frac{1}{k}\leq t\leq 1

\end{cases}

[/itex]

has a finite infinite-norm for all k, but the 1-norm goes to 0 as k goes infinity, then I can say that there's no c>0 that [itex]\left\|\cdot\right\|_{\infty}\leq c\left\|\cdot\right\|_{s}[/itex], and of course this is true for [itex][a,b][/itex] since I can map the [0,1] to the [a,b].

3. The attempt at a solution

I can't imagine some continuous function sequence that may be used as a counterexample to say that I can't bound the s-norms with the r-norms from below. I have done the work as I have proven for the norms in lp sequence spaces and I get that they are equivalent but I suspect they aren't. Please help.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Equivalence of p-norms in [itex]C^{0}_{p}[a,b][/itex]

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**