Equivalence Relations

In summary, to prove that RxS is an equivalence relation, you need to show that it satisfies the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. This can be done by showing that the elements (a,b) (RxS) (a,b) satisfy these properties, and then extending it to all other elements in ExF.
  • #1
9
0

Homework Statement



I need a little help in understand this question:

Let E and F be two sets, R a binary relation on the set E and S a binary relation on the set F. We define a binary relation, denoted RxS, on the set ExF in the following way ("coordinate- wise"):
(a,b) (RxS) (c,d) <--> aRc and bSd.
If R and S are equivalence relations, prove that RxS is an equivalence relation.


Homework Equations


unknown


The Attempt at a Solution



I said aRc => (a,c) and bSd=> (b,d)

I assumed that aRc and bSd are from ExF.
I'm not sure that what I am doing is right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ExF is the set of ordered pairs (x,y) where x is in E and y is in F. You have (a,b) and (c,d) are elements in ExF, so this means a and c are elements of E while b and d are elements of F.

To show that RxS is an equivalence relation, you need to show it satisfies three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

snaidu228 said:

Homework Statement



I need a little help in understand this question:

Let E and F be two sets, R a binary relation on the set E and S a binary relation on the set F. We define a binary relation, denoted RxS, on the set ExF in the following way ("coordinate- wise"):
(a,b) (RxS) (c,d) <--> aRc and bSd.
If R and S are equivalence relations, prove that RxS is an equivalence relation.


Homework Equations


unknown


The Attempt at a Solution



I said aRc => (a,c) and bSd=> (b,d)

I assumed that aRc and bSd are from ExF.
I'm not sure that what I am doing is right
 

Suggested for: Equivalence Relations

Replies
2
Views
771
Replies
1
Views
818
Replies
1
Views
983
Replies
10
Views
939
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
893
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top