- #1

- 5

- 0

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+exp(-x^2)+from+x0+to+inf

Note: this is not a homework question, merely a query.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter nanath
- Start date

- #1

- 5

- 0

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+exp(-x^2)+from+x0+to+inf

Note: this is not a homework question, merely a query.

- #2

Stephen Tashi

Science Advisor

- 7,739

- 1,525

- #3

Char. Limit

Gold Member

- 1,208

- 14

[tex]erfc(z) \equiv 1 - erf(z)[/tex]

However, this can be pretty easily changed to the integral definition if we remember that

[tex]erf(z) \equiv \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^z exp\left(-t^2\right) dt[/tex]

and furthermore that

[tex]\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^\infty exp\left(-t^2\right) dt = 1[/tex]

By substituting these definitions in for 1 and erf(z), we get this expression:

[tex]erfc(z) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^\infty exp\left(-t^2\right) dt - \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^z exp\left(-t^2\right) dt[/tex]

Which is easily proven using basic integral properties to be equal to the expression in the OP.

- #4

- 798

- 34

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+exp(-x^2)+from+x0+to+inf

Note: this is not a homework question, merely a query.

By definition of erfc :

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Erfc.html

- #5

- 5

- 0

- #6

Char. Limit

Gold Member

- 1,208

- 14

- #7

- 5

- 0

- #8

- 798

- 34

The erfc(x) is a function which is used exactly like the functions exp(x), ln(x), cos(x) or many others. All these functions have to be found numerically (except for a few particular values of x).

For example, what is the analytical expressiion of :

integrate (1/t)*dt from t=1 to t=x ?

Of course, the answer is ln(x). Then would you say "knowing that it has to be found numerically makes me slightly unhappy" ?

The only difference between erfc(x) and ln(x) is that one is familiar to you and the other not.

An almost similar question arised elsewhere about the integration of x^x. The consequence was a funny discussion reported in the paper "The Sophomores Dream Function" :

http://www.scribd.com/JJacquelin/documents

Share: