• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Error-function integral

  • Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date
  • #1
726
27

Homework Statement


If you know
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\alpha \beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi / \alpha} [/tex]
Show that
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \beta^2 e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}/2 [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried integration by parts on the second integral, but to no avail. I just end up with it being equal to zero. What am I to do?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
33,506
5,191

Homework Statement


If you know
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\alpha \beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi / \alpha} [/tex]
Show that
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \beta^2 e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}/2 [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried integration by parts on the second integral, but to no avail. I just end up with it being equal to zero. What am I to do?
How did you split the integrand up when you did integration by parts?
 
  • #3
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
You don't really need to do integration by parts. Take the derivative with respect to ##\alpha## of both sides of your first equation. Then set ##\alpha=1##.
 
  • #4
329
34
You don't really need to do integration by parts. Take the derivative with respect to ##\alpha## of both sides of your first equation. Then set ##\alpha=1##.
This is a very nice trick, and I like it a lot. But it could be Nikitin needs to work on integration by parts.
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
This is a very nice trick, and I like it a lot. But it could be Nikitin needs to work on integration by parts.
Yes, probably. It's easy enough to do that way too.
 
  • #6
726
27
Yeah, I must've done a silly mistake when doing the integration by parts. I set the ## \beta^2 ## term as u, and the ##e^{ -\beta^2} ## term as v'.

Then, (btw, how do I put limits on the left part of a bracket in latex?)

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \beta^2 e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \left [ \beta^2 \int e^{-\beta^2} d \beta \right ]_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} 2 \beta (\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta ) d \beta [/tex]

If I try to insert
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

into my integration by parts expression, I will just end up with 0. Can somebody please do it properly so I can find my mistake?

PS: Sorry for late reply. Oh, and thanks for all the help and nice tips :)

You don't really need to do integration by parts. Take the derivative with respect to ##\alpha## of both sides of your first equation. Then set ##\alpha=1##.
I don't want to be a bore (I like your method), but how do you know it's possible to differentiate the term inside the integral first, instead of taking the integral first and then differentiate?
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
I don't want to be a bore (I like your method), but how do you know it's possible to differentiate the term inside the integral first, instead of taking the integral first and then differentiate?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule And for your integration by parts, put ##dv=\beta e^{-\beta^2} d\beta##. What does that leave for u?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
726
27
I don't completely understand why you'd do that?

Is the integration-by-parts expression in post #6 correct? Why can't I just insert ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}## into the expression and solve?
 
  • #9
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
I don't completely understand why you'd do that?

Is the integration-by-parts expression in post #6 correct? Why can't I just insert ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}## into the expression and solve?
If you are going to set ##dv=e^{\beta^2}d\beta## then v is the INDEFINITE integral of dv. You don't apply the limits till the end. And that expression doesn't have an elementary indefinite integral. Hence my alternate suggestion.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
329
34
Yeah, I must've done a silly mistake when doing the integration by parts. I set the ## \beta^2 ## term as u, and the ##e^{ -\beta^2} ## term as v'.

Then, (btw, how do I put limits on the left part of a bracket in latex?)

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \beta^2 e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \left [ \beta^2 \int e^{-\beta^2} d \beta \right ]_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} 2 \beta (\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta ) d \beta [/tex]

If I try to insert
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta^2} d \beta = \sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

into my integration by parts expression, I will just end up with 0. Can somebody please do it properly so I can find my mistake?

PS: Sorry for late reply. Oh, and thanks for all the help and nice tips :)



I don't want to be a bore (I like your method), but how do you know it's possible to differentiate the term inside the integral first, instead of taking the integral first and then differentiate?
Re taking the derivative under the integral, note that the integral is with respect to ##\beta##. For purposes of regarding ##\alpha## as the variable to differentiate against, all the ##\beta## stuff is essentially a constant.

Re integration by parts take u(x) = x and v'(x) = x##e^{-\alpha x^2}##. The new integral will pop up looking very like the one you know to be ##\sqrt {\pi /\alpha}##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
726
27
Okay, now I fully understand. I didn't think about putting v'(x) = x e^-x^2, as I wasn't aware of
You don't apply the limits till the end. And that expression doesn't have an elementary indefinite integral.
Now everything is clear. Thanks guys!
 
  • #12
20,135
4,209
Getting back to Dick's method in response #3, I think what your textbook is trying to teach you is the technique of "differentiation under the integral sign." I think this is how the book intended for you to solve the problem.
 

Related Threads on Error-function integral

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
587
Replies
17
Views
787
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
671
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Top