I was collecting data for a simple physics lab today when I stumbled upon a question I couldn't answer.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Very basically, the lab consisted of measuring the time it takes a ball to drop a variety of distances, between 0 and 100cm. By plotting [tex]\frac{y}{t}[/tex] vs. [tex]t[/tex] (where y is height and t is time) and running a LSQ fit, you can find the value of g. I want to take data at 20 different heights between 0cm and 100cm.

[tex]

y = V_0t + \frac{1}{2} gt^2

[/tex]

so [tex]g[/tex] is going to be proportional to [tex] u = \frac{y}{t^2} [/tex] where [tex]u[/tex] is [tex]\frac{1}{2}g[/tex].

Running error propagation:

[tex]

du^2 = (\frac{\partial u}{\partial y})^2 dy^2 + (\frac{\partial u}{\partial t})^2 dt^2

[/tex]

[tex]

(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}) = \frac{1}{t^2}, and (\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}) = \frac{2y}{t}

[/tex]

So obviously of my 20 heights I should take more data down low and less data up high, because the longer the ball is falling, the less the error becomes, whereas the error in y is constant regardless of height.

Now my question is this: ideally, how should I space the 20 heights at which I will take data? What I'm basically asking is how to analytically solve for constant [tex]du[/tex] when the range and number of data points to be taken is given.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Error propagation and optimum

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**