I can't find any good references on Euclideanizing path integrals (from Minkowski to Euclidean metric).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I understand how this is done in perturbative 1-loop calculations, where the pole structure of the Feynman propagators are used to perform the so-called Wick Rotation. This seems to be a perfectly valid procedure in light of complex analysis (in particular, Cauchy's theorem).

However, in path integrals, there are no poles per-se. How is the passage into imaginary time justified? AND does such Euclideanization always yield a Hamiltonian in the exponent?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Euclideanizing Path Integrals

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Euclideanizing Path Integrals | Date |
---|---|

I QFT in Euclidean or Minkowski Spacetime | Feb 23, 2017 |

A Ground state wave function from Euclidean path integral | Dec 9, 2016 |

A Euclidean signature and compact gauge group | Mar 8, 2016 |

Continuing to Euclidean Space Justified in Path Integral? | Feb 25, 2015 |

Euclidean path integral | Oct 16, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**