Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Euler Lagrange of this

  1. Dec 14, 2014 #1
    If metric is $$ds^2 = -f(x)dt^2 + g(x)dx^2 + 2l(x)dxdt $$
    Then we have this Lagrangian:

    $$L= \frac{1}{2}(-f(x)\dot{t}^2 + g(x)\dot{x}^2 + 2l(x)\dot{x}\dot{t}).$$

    The Euler-Lagrange equation for $$t$$ is:

    since $$t$$ is not there in the Lagrangian then $$\partial L/ \partial t=0$$
    This implies that $$\frac{d}{d\tau}\frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{t}}= 0$$

    so $$\frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{t}}$$ is a conserved quantity we call energy and I got it equal to $$-f\dot{t} + l\dot{x}$$ where my professor only got it $$ E= -f\dot{t}$$

    Am I mistaken somewhere?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 14, 2014 #2

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Looking at this another way, we know that since the metric does not depend on ##t## that ##\partial_t## is a Killing field, meaning ##E=g_{ab}u^a(\partial_t)^a=-fu^t+lu^x=-f\dot{t}+l\dot{x}## so it looks like you are correct and your professor is missing the second factor...
     
  4. Dec 14, 2014 #3
    Thank you!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook