Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Euler's method

  1. Dec 26, 2004 #1
    Hello, I am having trouble understanding a question in relation to Euler's method.

    Basically, the question goes something like Euler's method is solved to solve the differential equation [tex]\frac{{dy}}{{dx}} = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)[/tex], with a step size of 0.05 and initial condition y = 0 when x = 0. Let A be magnitude of the area enclosed by the curve [tex]f\left( x \right) = \log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)[/tex], the coordinate axes and the line x = 1. Why is [tex]y_{20}[/tex] an estimate of A?

    Answer: [tex]y_{20} \approx \int\limits_0^{x_{20} } {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)} dx = \int\limits_0^1 {\log _e \left( {4 - x^2 } \right)dx} = A[/tex]

    I do not understand the answer. As far as I understand, [tex]y_{20}[/tex] is just the value of the antiderivative at x = 1, given initial conditions but the answer does not make use of the initial conditions. I do not see how [tex]y_{20}[/tex] can be considered to be an approximation of A if the initial conditions are not used.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 26, 2004 #2

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    1.[tex]A=:\int_{0}^{1} \ln(4-x^{2}) dx [/tex]
    2.The initial condition imposed on the solution of the ODE is reflected in the limits of integration.Namely the inferior limit is chosen x=0 and the superior one corresponds to [itex] x_{20}=20\cdot 0.05=1 [/itex],where i made use of the fact that the step size is 0.05.So the initial conditions are used and the fact that [itex] y_{20} [/itex] and not other 'y' gives u the approximatimation is due to the fact that the initial condition is y(x=0)=0 and the step is 0.05.Had the step been 0.01,you would have found x=1 for x_{100} and similar the corresponding 'y'.

    Daniel.
     
  4. Dec 26, 2004 #3
    I see what you mean. I was thinking about it along those lines but I probably thought about the comments included with the solution too much which obscured by understanding of the solution. Thanks for your help.
     
  5. Dec 27, 2004 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    In addition, Euler's method is a special case of the "Taylor's series" method.

    Suppose the differential equation is dy/dx= f(x,y).

    The general definition of Taylor's series for an infinitely differentiable function y, about x0 is y(x0)+ y'(x0)(x- x0+ (1/2)y"(x0)(x-x0)+ ...
    If x- x0= h (so that x= x0+h) is small then the higher powers of (x-x0) will be "negligible" and we have y(x0+h)= y(x0)+ f(x0,y(x0))(x-x0) so that
    δy= y(x0+h)- y(x0)= f(x0,y(x0))h.

    If you have a way of evaluating df(x,y)/dx (you will need to use the chain rule), you can get a better approximation by y(x0+h)= y(x0)+ f(x0,y(x0))h+ (1/2)(df(x0,y(x0))/dx)h2.
     
  6. Dec 27, 2004 #5
    Thanks for posting the extra information.
     
  7. Jan 27, 2005 #6
    2002 VCE Specialist Maths exam Benny?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Euler's method
  1. Euler method (Replies: 12)

  2. Euler's Method (Replies: 3)

Loading...