Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Euler's relation

  1. Nov 6, 2008 #1
    Hello everyone,
    Can anyone give me a brief explanation about how EULER derived the formula exp(j*)=cos*+jsin* without going into his actual derivation..
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 6, 2008 #2

    nicksauce

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I'm not sure exactly how Euler did it, but a simple way to do it is to write out the taylor series for both sides of the equation and showing that they are equal.
     
  4. Nov 6, 2008 #3

    lurflurf

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I think Euler used series expansion. This result is not really derived though, since it is the extension of the definition into a larger domain. Usually several properties of
    exp:R->R
    are chosen to be preserved in the extension
    exp:C->C
    and the formula folows naturally
    I like preserving these properties
    exp(a+b)=exp(a)*exp(b)
    and
    lim_{x->0}[exp(x)-1]/x=1
     
  5. Nov 7, 2008 #4
    Euler did use the series expansion, plugging in [itex]\theta := i\theta[/tex] in the defining series for the exponential,

    [tex]\exp{\theta} = \sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} \frac{\theta^{n}}{n!}[/tex]

    and seperating real and imaginary parts. It was a phenomenal achievement in the true Eulerian spirit. A bit of a shame that people overlook this 'derivation' entirely and choose to define the exponential from scratch nowadays.
     
  6. Nov 7, 2008 #5

    lurflurf

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It is overlooked because it is not a 'derivation'. You cannot 'derive' an identity of a function without first giving a definition of the function. It is possible to extend the real exponential to the complex plane by analytic continuation, and this is done in introductory books with titles like analysis or complex variables. The approach involves Heavy lifting.
     
  7. Nov 7, 2008 #6
    This is precisely why I chose to emphasise 'derivation', however, my criticism is not of the analytic extension as such, but of the practice to simply define,

    [tex]\exp{it} = \cos{t} + i\sin{t}[/tex].

    A better approach is to define the complex analogue as,

    [tex]\exp{z} = \sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} \frac{z^{n}}{n!} [/tex]
    , establish global convergence and proceed to show as Euler did that this may be considered to be composed of two components which in themselves may be used to define (or show that they are the corresponding Taylor expansions about the origin of) the cosine and sine functions.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Euler's relation
  1. Euler's equalities (Replies: 5)

  2. Euler's formula (Replies: 9)

  3. Euler's Number (Replies: 4)

Loading...