The specific method for determining who moves on in a tie situation can vary depending on the context and the individuals involved. Some common methods include a tiebreaker game, a coin toss, or a vote among a panel of judges.
While it is difficult to guarantee complete fairness and lack of bias in any decision-making process, there are methods that can help reduce the potential for bias. These include using a randomized process, such as a coin toss, or having a neutral third party make the final decision.
The factors that should be considered can vary based on the context of the tie. Some common factors include performance, skill, experience, and any specific criteria or rules that have been established for the situation.
In some cases, a tie may be unable to be resolved through traditional methods. In these situations, it may be necessary to seek alternative solutions, such as consulting a higher authority or reevaluating the criteria for determining who moves on.
It is possible for a tiebreaker to unfairly disadvantage one party if the method used is not carefully chosen and implemented. This is why it is important to consider the potential biases and limitations of any chosen tiebreaker method.