Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Every time I read an article about black hole evaporation through Hawking radiation, it seems to me that the writer didn't bother to connect all the dots so it will be clear for dummies like me.

In many articles, I find 2 contradictory statements:

1. Black hole emits a radiation (i.e photons !!!) with a spectrum identical to black body radiation at a temperature which is inversely proportional to the black hole mass.

2. This radiation is created from a pair of particles that appears at the event horizon, one with negative energy that falls in and the other with positive energy that escapes. Hence the total energy (hence mass, E=mc^2) of the black hole is reduces.

I can't find the logic in here:

1. If the black hole emits particles, where do the photons of the black body radiation comes from?

2. Why is the negative energy particle always falls in? The positive energy particle should fall in sometimes with equal probability, so the whole evaporation process should cancel out.

3. What is a negative energy particle anyway?? From E=mc^2 it should have negative mass??? How is that possible??

4. If we consider the option that both particles has positive mass, than it doesn't matter which one falls in, but then the black hole acquires mass, not losing it.

Can anyone solve this for me, please?

Thanks,

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Evaporation of black holes

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Evaporation black holes | Date |
---|---|

B Temperature of a black hole...observed from the singularity | Jan 29, 2018 |

I Hawking radiation and energy-negative energy pair production | Apr 30, 2016 |

Black hole evaporation, where does it all go? | May 6, 2013 |

Black hole growth and evaporation | Apr 5, 2013 |

Black Holes: Infalling Observers and BH Evaporation | May 30, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**