Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Even and odd signals

  1. Apr 18, 2007 #1
    Hi i am stuck with something really simple :(
    I know that we can express a signal with the even and odd signal
    (xe(t) means even signal and xo(t) means odd signal)

    x(-t)=x(t) for even signals and (1)
    x(-t)=-x(t) for odd signals (2)

    where even signal is
    xe(t)=1/2[x(t)+x(-t)] (3) and the odd one is
    xo(t)=1/2[x(t)-x(-t)] (4)
    i can validate that x(t)=xe(t)+xo(t) if i use equations 3 and 4
    x(t)=1/2[x(t)+x(-t)]+1/2[x(t)-x(-t)]= 1/2x(t)+1/2x(t)+1/2x(-t)-1/2x(-t)= x(t) done

    My problem arise when i try to use (1)+(2) to (3)+(4) to prove what i want
    using (1) to (3) we have xe(t)=1/2[x(t)+x(t)] =2/2x(t)
    using (2) to (4) we have xo(t)=1/2[x(t)-(-x(t))] =2/2x(t) and that means that i have proved that x(t)=4x(t)

    P.S Plz tell me where i am wrond and correct my bad english mathematical phrases
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 18, 2007 #2
    Why would you consider equations 1 and 2 at all? A generic function x(t) will not have those properties always. The only function for which both of those equations can be true is x(t) = 0, which is consistent with your result x(t) = 4x(t).
  4. Apr 18, 2007 #3
    I cant understand what u are saying me . Plz try to clarify where i am wrong.
    Thx a lot
  5. Apr 18, 2007 #4
    Ok here is what makes your thinking wrong: You try to use x(-t) = x(t) and x(-t) = -x(t), two VERY SPECIFIC conditions, to show something for any x(t) which could have any sort of shape. What you meant to use for equations 1 and 2 was:

    xe(-t) = xe(t) (1)
    xo(-t) = -xo(t) (2)

    If you assume equations 1 and 2 are true then you are implying x(t) = 0 for all t

    I hope I made myself more understandable.
  6. Apr 19, 2007 #5
    Yes thx a lot i have clearly understand my wrong. But if someone ask me to prove that
    xe(t)=1/2[x(t)+x(-t)] how shouldi think to prove that?
  7. Apr 19, 2007 #6
    I would use the definition of an even function xe(t) = xe(-t), but recall that xe(t) = 1/2[x(t) + x(-t)], so what would xe(-t) be?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook