Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Everett and time travel

  1. Sep 15, 2003 #1
    A common claim is that in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, grandfather paradoxes are avoided because you end up in a different universe when you travel back in time. Does anyone here know whether this is true, and how it works? Is there a web site that explains it well?

    I'm suspicious because it seems to me it would give you a way to test which interpretation of quantum mechanics is true.

    Also, aren't there just as strong consistency constraints on a "wave function of the universe" as on a classical, single universe? Does this lead to a global version of the grandfather paradox across all Everett-worlds?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 15, 2003 #2
    Considering an infinite number of alternative universes, all possiblities of all outcomes are possible. It would essentially be childsplay to avoid the grandfather paradox in such a situation.
     
  4. Sep 15, 2003 #3

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Suppose you had one of those FTL send-messages-to-the-past devices that works by sending an instantaneous message to a remote frame moving away at a high sublight speed, converting the message to that frame (e.g. by reflection) and sending it back, still instantaneous but now in the remote frame's spacelike slice which intersects the past of your worldline. What would you get back in an Everett universe? White noise? For in interacting with the remote frame certainly many branches could be created and they would all be relected back.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Everett and time travel
  1. Time Travel (Replies: 1)

  2. Time travel (Replies: 3)

  3. Time travel (Replies: 3)

  4. Time Travel (Replies: 4)

  5. Time travel? (Replies: 3)

Loading...