Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Evolution theory.

  1. Mar 9, 2004 #1
    Edit. My ideas are incomplete.
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 9, 2004 #2

    Will anyone join me for a big "WTF?!"?
  4. Mar 9, 2004 #3


    User Avatar

  5. Mar 9, 2004 #4


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, but what kind of cookies?

    MMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmm. Coooookies.
  6. Mar 9, 2004 #5


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Ok, I was going to ask WTF??? But I thought maybe he meant, in a very weird way, that we needed diversity to survive.
  7. Mar 9, 2004 #6
    I think that (s)he's been infected by Doug Moon.
  8. Mar 9, 2004 #7
    Actually I think he meant we need to create points to survive. In otherwords we need to become a load of social darwinist spartans.
  9. Mar 10, 2004 #8
    maybe he means the Internet type cookies
  10. Mar 10, 2004 #9
    sooo let me get this straight.....
    If I don't have sex I'll evolve???
    What kind of evolution are you refering to?
  11. Mar 10, 2004 #10
    Lets see here...

    Evolution is driven by natural selection, not geometry or ganja cookies. Points don't evolve, life does. Your right, people aren't defined by geometry? I like to climb cliffs and I have fallen a couple times yet evolution has not killed me(obviously).

    The vocabulary of your "theory" needs to be more cleary defined, but in order for that to happen, you would probably have to know what you are talking about.
  12. Mar 10, 2004 #11

    First, define a "unified method" and tell me why evolution should/does follow your "unified method". Secondly, provide some sort of geometrical proof of what you say, you can't just say "this is true because of geometry!" you must actually show data or mathemetical evidence that supports your theory.

    I am pretty strong though, I've got a hard head too.
  13. Mar 11, 2004 #12
    I have a most conclusive mathematical proof proving that your statement is false..

    Alpha + beta - oranges = One happy monkey.

    As you can see here, it is obvious that your statement is wrong. I would perhaps try a different angle if I were you.
  14. Mar 11, 2004 #13
    I hold that my postulate is just as valid as yours.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?