Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Exercise from basic Fourier Analysis

  1. Aug 30, 2004 #1
    I really need help with this exercise (it's from a course in basic fourier analysis). It consists of two parts:

    (i) Let [Tex] s_0 = 1/2 [/Tex] and [Tex] s_n = 1/2 + \sum_{j=1}^{n}\cos(jx) [/Tex] for [Tex] n \geq 1 [/Tex]. By writing [Tex] s_n = \left(\sum_{j=-n}^{n}e^{ijx}\right)/2 [/Tex] and summing geometric series show that [Tex] (n+1)^{-1}\sum_{j=0}^{n}s_j \rightarrow 0 [/Tex] as [Tex] n \rightarrow \infty [/Tex] for all [Tex] x \neq 0~mod~2\pi [/Tex], and so

    [Tex] 0 = 1/2 + \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\cos(jx) [/Tex] in the Cesáro sense.

    (ii) Show similarly that, if [Tex] x \neq 0~mod~2\pi [/Tex], then

    [Tex] cot(x/2) = 2\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\sin(jx) [/Tex] in the Cesáro sense.

    In (i) I have tried to write out two geometric series and summing them, but I can't get the desired result. I have no idea on (ii).

    "in the Cesáro sense" means (i think) that the average of a given sequence [Tex] s_0,s_1,s_2,\ldots [/Tex] converges against a given limit L (the sequence itself doesn't nescessarily) - that is, the sequence [Tex] s_0, (s_0 + s_1)/2, (s_0 + s_1 + s_2)/3,\ldots \rightarrow L [/Tex].
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 30, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Is this how you meant it?
    (Use "tex" not "Tex")
  4. Aug 30, 2004 #3
    For part i, I would say one should first convert [tex] s_n = \left(\sum_{j=-n}^{n}e^{ijx}\right)/2 [/tex] into simpler form using the sum of geometric series formula. Then one should have no difficulty in finding [tex]\sum_{n} s_{n}[/tex]. Moreover one should note that for all integer m, [tex]|e^{imx}|=1[/tex] for all real x.
  5. Aug 31, 2004 #4
    Thanks for answering.. I have shown that [tex] (n+1)^{-1} \sum_{j=0}^{n} s_n \rightarrow 0 [/tex] as [tex] n \rightarrow \infty [/tex], but I can't see exactly how that relates to solving (i)...
  6. Aug 31, 2004 #5
    Did you mean (ii)?
  7. Aug 31, 2004 #6
    yes, i'm sorry, part (ii).. I have no idea on that one (i assume cot(x) = cos(x)/sin(x))
  8. Aug 31, 2004 #7
    hi broegger.

    I did not do part (ii), but I think all they want you to realise that [tex]sinx = \frac {1}{2i} (e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) [/tex]. Using this formula, find [tex] \sum_{j=0}^{n} sin(jx) [/tex]. Then all the steps are similar to what you did in part i), I think. Of course one should always remember [tex] cosx = \frac{1}{2} (e^{ix}+e^{-ix}) [/tex] and [tex]sinx = \frac {1}{2i} (e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) [/tex]. Using these, one may find an expression for cot(x/2) in "complex" exponential.

    I did not do it, but I think that may be the way to do it.
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2004
  9. Aug 31, 2004 #8
    Hi. Thank you very much for taking the time to help me.

    I'll try the method you advised for part (ii).. about part (i) I'm not sure my reasoning are correct; how can you apply the geometric series formula when the series in question are not infinite - ex. [tex] \sum_{j=-4}^{4}e^{ijx} = 1/2 + \sum_{j=1}^{4}\cos(jx) [/tex]. I don't know if you see what I mean (maybe I'm getting this all wrong).
  10. Aug 31, 2004 #9
    broegger, do you know that 1+r+r^2+...r^n = (1-r^(n+1))/(1-r)?
  11. Aug 31, 2004 #10
    Erm.. How can that be true?? In the limit [tex] n = \infty [/tex] the sum you are mentioning is equal to 1/(1-r).

    I'm really troubled by this :\
  12. Aug 31, 2004 #11
    Let S(r) = 1+r..+r^n, then
    r*S(r) = r+r^2+...+r^(n+1)
    (1-r)*S(r) = 1-r^(n+1)
    S(r) = (1-r^(n+1))/(1-r)

    Yes, the limit of the expression as n tends to infinity tends to 1/(1-r), *if*|r|<1.
  13. May 11, 2007 #12
    Three years old, but now I'm trying to solve the problem ((i)).

    I suppose

    [tex] 2s_n = \sum_{j=-n}^{n}e^{ijx} = \frac{1-e^{(i x)(n+1)}}{1-e^{i x}}+\frac{1-e^{(-i x)(n+1)}}{1-e^{-i x}}-1 [/tex]

    so I have to show (?) that

    [tex] \lim_{p\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{p+1}\sum_{n=0}^{p}s_n=\lim_{p\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{p+1}\sum_{n=0}^{p}\left(\frac{1-e^{(i x)(n+1)}}{1-e^{i x}}+\frac{1-e^{(-i x)(n+1)}}{1-e^{-i x}}-1\right)/2=0. [/tex]

    Apparently one should have no difficulty in showing that, but I do.
    Last edited: May 11, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Exercise from basic Fourier Analysis
  1. Fourier Analysis (Replies: 2)

  2. Fourier analysis (Replies: 3)

  3. Fourier analysis (Replies: 4)

  4. Basic analysis (Replies: 8)