Let $$M$$ be a surface with Riemannian metric $$g$$. Recall that an orthonormal framing of $$M$$ is an ordered pair of vector fields $$(E_1,E_2)$$ such that $$g(E_i,E_j)=\delta_{ij}$$. Prove that an orthonormal framing exists iff $$M$$ is orientable and $$M$$ admits a nowhere vanishing vector field $$X$$.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Remark: It's obvious in $$\mathbb{R}^3$$, but how to formally justify it?

The definition for orientabily: $$M$$ is orientable if there exists an atlas $$(u_{\alpha},M_{\alpha})_{\alpha}$$ such that $$\mathrm{det}(\mathrm{d}(u_{\beta}\circ u_{\alpha}^{-1}))>0$$, for each $$(\alpha,\beta)$$ such that $$M_{\alpha} \cap M_{\beta} \neq \Phi$$

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Existence of orthonormal frame

Loading...

Similar Threads - Existence orthonormal frame | Date |
---|---|

I Does a covariant version of Euler-Lagrange exist? | Feb 20, 2018 |

A Existence of Complex Structures and Characteristic Classes | Sep 12, 2016 |

Intuition and existence for convex neighbourhoods | Mar 10, 2015 |

Metric and existence of parallel lines! | Mar 6, 2014 |

Covariant derivative of Lie-Bracket in normal orthonormal frame | Dec 6, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**