Expectation Value of f(x): Physical Meaning

In summary, the conversation discusses the expectation value of any function in quantum mechanics, which is given by the integral of the function multiplied by the wave function squared. The functions represent operators, but not all operators can be represented as functions. Examples of these functions include the position operator and the momentum operator. The expectation values of these functions represent the expected values of measurements of position and the square of measurements of position, respectively. The latter can also represent potential energy in a harmonic oscillator.
  • #1
Technon
17
3
The expectation value of any function ##f(x)## is given by [tex]<f(x)>= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\psi^2(x) dx[/tex]
But what is ##f(x)## actually? In a physical sense.

For example if ##f(x)=x## or ##f(x)=x^2##, what do these functions represent on a physical level?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Technon said:
The expectation value of any function ##f(x)## is given by

In QM, expectation values aren't properties of functions; they're properties of operators. The expectation value of an operator ##\hat{A}## is (note that we're using a particular representation, the one-dimensional position representation, in all of this--things look different in other representations)

$$
\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \psi^* (x) \hat{A} \psi (x) dx
$$

For example, the position operator ##\hat{Q}## is just ##x##, i.e., "multiply by ##x##"; so its expectation value is

$$
\langle \hat{Q} \rangle = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} x \psi^* (x) \psi (x) dx
$$

which is similar to what you wrote (note that we can rearrange the factors inside the integral because multiplication of functions is commutative). Similarly, an operator that was something like "multiply by ##f(x)##", where ##f(x)## is some function of ##x##, would have an expectation value that looks similar to what you wrote.

However, this won't be true for all operators, because not all operators can be represented as "multiply by some function ##f(x)##". For example, the momentum operator ##\hat{P}## is ##- i \hbar d / dx##, so its expectation value is

$$
\langle \hat{P} \rangle = - i \hbar \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \psi^* (x) \frac{d \psi (x)}{dx} dx
$$

which is not similar to what you wrote.

Technon said:
what do these functions represent on a physical level?

As should be evident from the above, the functions represent operators, but, as noted, not all operators can be represented as functions.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and ParticleMan
  • #3
I'm sure that's very good but I really just want to know some examples of what the functions represent physically.

Example: Find (a) ##<x>## and (b) ##<x^2>## for a particle in its ground state in a box of length L.

So I calculated these and got some values, and I checked the answers are correct, but what did I actually calculate? I mean what do these functions and their expectation value represent on a physical (not just mathematical) level?
 
  • Like
Likes ParticleMan
  • #4
Technon said:
I'm sure that's very good but I really just want to know some examples of what the functions represent physically.

And I answered that: they represent operators (though not all operators can be so represented). I even told you explicitly which operator "multiply by ##x##" represents.

Technon said:
Example

Where is this example from?
 
  • #5
Technon said:
I'm sure that's very good but I really just want to know some examples of what the functions represent physically.

Example: Find (a) ##<x>## and (b) ##<x^2>## for a particle in its ground state in a box of length L.

So I calculated these and got some values, and I checked the answers are correct, but what did I actually calculate? I mean what do these functions and their expectation value represent on a physical (not just mathematical) level?

Those are the expected values of a) a measurement of position and b) the square of a measurement of position.
 
  • Like
Likes ParticleMan
  • #6
PeroK said:
Those are the expected values of a) a measurement of position and b) the square of a measurement of position.
Thanks for a direct answer. Measurement of position makes sense, because the answer was L/2, which means the expected value for the position is in the center of the box which makes sense.

"Square of a measurement of position" however, seems more like a mathematical abstraction than representing something physical. Or does it also represent some physical quality, like for example velocity, acceleration, potential energy, etc?

Where is this example from?
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th Edition
 
  • #7
Technon said:
"Square of a measurement of position" however, seems more like a mathematical abstraction than representing something physical. Or does it also represent some physical quality, like for example velocity, acceleration, potential energy, etc?

It's essentially the potential energy in a harmonic oscillator: ##\frac12 m \omega^2 x^2##.

In general, you could take ##f(x)## to be the function of position determined by your potential.
 
  • #8
PeroK said:
It's essentially the potential energy in a harmonic oscillator: ##\frac12 m \omega^2 x^2##.

In general, you could take ##f(x)## to be the function of position determined by your potential.
Ok. The answer for that question was 0.283L^2. Does that mean that this is the expected value for the potential energy of the particle in the box?
 
  • #9
Technon said:
Ok. The answer for that question was 0.283L^2. Does that mean that this is the expected value for the potential energy of the particle in the box?

How would I know that? If you have specific problems, you ought to post them in homework.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
How would I know that? If you have specific problems, you ought to post them in homework.
The question is not whether that answer is correct, which I already verified it is. The question is what the answer means. Does <x^2> represent the expected value for the potential energy of the particle in the box?
 
  • #11
Technon said:
The question is not whether that answer is correct, which I already verified it is. The question is what the answer means. Does <x^2> represent the expected value for the potential energy of the particle in the box?

The particle in a box usually means it has no potential energy. It's not a harmonic oscillator, in any case.

But, ##\langle x^2 \rangle## is also needed to calculate the variance and standard deviation for position measurements.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
The particle in a box usually means it has no potential energy.
<x^2> represents expected value of the potential energy and it has been calculated to be not zero, then that seems incorrect.
 
  • #13
Technon said:
<x^2> represents expected value of the potential energy

No, ##\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 <x^2>## represents the expected value of the potential energy for a harmonic oscillator. As @PeroK has already pointed out, a particle in a box is not a harmonic oscillator.

As I've already asked, where did you get this question from? It would help if we knew the context.

[Edited to fix user reference above.]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
PeterDonis said:
No, ##\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 <x^2>## represents the expected value of the potential energy for a harmonic oscillator. As @Ibix has already pointed out, a particle in a box is not a harmonic oscillator.
So what does only <x^2> represent?

PeterDonis said:
As I've already asked, where did you get this question from? It would help if we knew the context.
I already answered, see post above. Unfortunately there isn't more information given in the example written there than what I've written here.
 
  • #15
Technon said:
So what does only <x^2> represent?

Multiplying or dividing by numbers doesn't change the physical meaning, just the units. If you pick units such that ##\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 = 1##, then the expectation value of potential energy for a harmonic oscillator is just ##<x^2>##.
 
  • #16
PeterDonis said:
As @Ibix has already pointed out, a particle in a box is not a harmonic oscillator.
@PeroK, I presume. "Refresh knowledge of QM" is still on my to-do list.
 
  • #17
Technon said:
I already answered, see post above.

Ah, got it.

Technon said:
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th Edition

Looking through what I can see online in this textbook, it appears to be taking a very rote learning approach--tell you some basic stuff, tell you how to calculate things, but not explain the physical models very much. I don't see anything at all about operators in the QM section (of course not all of it is visible online and I don't have the actual book), and to me that's a key concept in QM since it's one of the main concepts that doesn't occur in classical mechanics, and since it's central to a fundamental change in the nature of models between classical mechanics and QM.

In any case, for the particle in a box, which is what it appears to be asking for expectation values for, the operator ##x^2## doesn't have any physical meaning apart from being the square of the position operator, and useful in computing averages and variances. So I'm not sure why the textbook is even asking for its expectation value to be computed, since it doesn't talk about any of that stuff that I can see.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #18
Ibix said:
@PeroK, I presume.

Oops, yes. Will edit my post to fix.
 
  • #19
Technon said:
"Square of a measurement of position" however, seems more like a mathematical abstraction than representing something physical. Or does it also represent some physical quality, like for example velocity, acceleration, potential energy, etc?
Informally, it tells us how tightly localized the particle is. If you measure the position of the particle many times and average the results, you will get something close to the expectation value of ##x##; but if the expectation value of ##\langle{x}^2\rangle## is large compared with ##\langle{x}\rangle^2## then it is likely that many of the individual measurements will be far from ##\langle{x}\rangle##. That's part of what @PeroK was getting at in the second sentence of post #11 above.
(Do be aware that to make what I just wrote work properly always you have to label your x-axis in such a way that ##\langle{x}\rangle=0##. This is always possible, and doing so allows my simplified explanation of the physical significance of ##\langle{x}^2\rangle##).

As other have pointed out, ##\langle{x}^2\rangle## is also the potential energy of a harmonic oscillator. That's because of the specific properties of the harmonic oscillator potential so is not generally true for all quantum systems... But if you think about how the potential energy of a harmonic oscillator varies with distance from the center, it will be intuitively obvious that ##\langle{x}^2\rangle## should have this physical meaning in this particular system.
 
  • #20
##<f(x)>## is approximately the value of the average of ##f(x)## when ##x## runs over independent measurements of the observable ##x## (here the position). ##\sqrt{<f(x)^2>-<f(x)>^2}## is approximately the value of the corresponding standard deviation, giving the intrinsic uncertainty of these measurements. In particular, ##<x^2>## is needed to calculate the uncertainty of the position measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #21
PeterDonis said:
Looking through what I can see online in this textbook, it appears to be taking a very rote learning approach--tell you some basic stuff, tell you how to calculate things, but not explain the physical models very much. I don't see anything at all about operators in the QM section (of course not all of it is visible online and I don't have the actual book), and to me that's a key concept in QM since it's one of the main concepts that doesn't occur in classical mechanics, and since it's central to a fundamental change in the nature of models between classical mechanics and QM.

In any case, for the particle in a box, which is what it appears to be asking for expectation values for, the operator ##x^2## doesn't have any physical meaning apart from being the square of the position operator, and useful in computing averages and variances. So I'm not sure why the textbook is even asking for its expectation value to be computed, since it doesn't talk about any of that stuff that I can see.
I absolutely agree, I'm disappointed in some sections of the book are only mentioned briefly without proper explanations and they would have needed more information.

I made some pictures of the related parts from the book, if it helps:

rJT2TP4.jpg
 

Attachments

  • rJT2TP4.jpg
    rJT2TP4.jpg
    59.9 KB · Views: 397
  • Like
Likes bhobba

What is the expectation value of f(x)?

The expectation value of f(x) is a mathematical concept that represents the average value of a function f(x) over a given range of values. It is denoted by <x> and is calculated by integrating the product of f(x) and the probability density function over the range.

What is the physical meaning of the expectation value of f(x)?

The physical meaning of the expectation value of f(x) is that it represents the most probable value of a physical quantity. In other words, it is the average value that we would expect to measure if we were to repeat the same experiment or observation multiple times.

How is the expectation value of f(x) related to uncertainty?

The expectation value of f(x) is related to uncertainty through the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This principle states that the product of the uncertainties in a particle's position and momentum is always greater than or equal to the reduced Planck's constant. The expectation value of f(x) represents the most probable value of a physical quantity, while the uncertainty represents the range of values that the quantity can take on.

Can the expectation value of f(x) be negative?

Yes, the expectation value of f(x) can be negative. This can occur if the probability density function is skewed towards negative values or if the function itself takes on negative values over the given range.

How is the expectation value of f(x) used in quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, the expectation value of f(x) is used to calculate the average value of a physical observable, such as position, momentum, or energy. It is an important tool for understanding the behavior of quantum systems and making predictions about their properties.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
906
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
538
Replies
2
Views
487
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
709
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
774
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
960
Back
Top