Can a Computer Generate Precognition Through Positron Experimentation?

  • Thread starter rhenretta
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Experiment
In summary, according to Feynman, matter moving forward in time is indistinguishable from anti-matter moving backward in time. And vice versa. Additionally, time flows horizontally from left to right in the diagrams shown.
  • #1
rhenretta
66
0
I'm sure there is a simple explanation as to why this wouldn't work, please enlighten me.

Take a computer, which generates a random number. When the number is generated, a positron gun shoots out that exact number of positrons into a vacuum with a magnetic field. On the other end of the vacuum, a detector waits to read the number of positrons, then display that number.

I'm torn on what would actually happen here. According to Feynman, anti mater moves backwards in time. However, under the same hypothesis, a PET scanner would return an image before the positrons were ever emitted, and that obviously doesn't happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
rhenretta said:
According to Feynman, anti mater moves backwards in time.

I think the statement you are looking for is:

Matter moving forward in time is indistinguishable from anti-matter moving backward in time. And vice versa.

Anti-matter is routinely created in colliders, and it moves forward in time.
 
  • #3
But what about the Feynman diagrams showing positrons moving backwards in time when they annihilate with an electron?
ie
http://www.howgravityworks.org/images/300px-electron-positron-annihilation_svg_gcnc.png
 
  • #4
rhenretta said:
But what about the Feynman diagrams showing positrons moving backwards in time when they annihilate with an electron?
ie
http://www.howgravityworks.org/images/300px-electron-positron-annihilation_svg_gcnc.png

Time flows horizontally from left to right in this diagram. The arrows do go forward in time.

There is a mathematical manipulation which consists in identifying a particle moving backward in time with negative energy as an antiparticle moving forward in time with positive energy. It is the condition of energy positivity which assigns the proper time flow. Those particles moving backward in time are curiosities rather than physical.
 
  • #5
So, if I understand this correctly, if it were technically possible to send a positron backwards in time then we would be able to trap it in a wire in exactly the same way as we do with electrons. The problem is, it is technically impossible to send even a positron backwards in time...
 

1. What is precognition?

Precognition is the ability to gain knowledge about future events before they happen through extrasensory perception (ESP) or other supernatural means.

2. What is an experiment for precognition?

An experiment for precognition is a scientific study designed to test the existence and accuracy of precognition. This can involve a variety of methods, such as controlled trials, statistical analysis, and brain imaging techniques.

3. Can anyone participate in an experiment for precognition?

Yes, anyone can participate in an experiment for precognition. However, researchers often have specific criteria for participants, such as being above a certain age, having no prior experience with precognition, and being in good physical and mental health.

4. How do scientists measure precognition in an experiment?

Scientists use a variety of methods to measure precognition in an experiment, including physiological measurements, such as brain activity and heart rate, self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks. These measures are used to determine if a participant has accurately predicted a future event before it occurs.

5. What have scientists discovered about precognition through experiments?

The results of experiments for precognition have been mixed, with some studies showing evidence of precognition and others showing no significant results. Some scientists argue that more research is needed to fully understand the phenomenon, while others believe that precognition is not a real ability. Overall, the scientific community remains divided on the existence of precognition.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top