I have the mathematical background to compute things in quantum mechanics. If you give me a standard QM problem to solve I could probably do it. However, I have an extreme lack of understanding of why the postulates of QM are set up the way they are - that the complete description of a particle is given by an element of a Hilbert space and that there are these operators that represent position, momentum, angular momentum, and so on that seem like they were pulled out of a hat.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Now the basis for any physical theory is grounded in experiment, so I would like to know the observations that establish the way quantum mechanics is set up. Thought experiments with results would be fine, I don't need the actual data from real experiments.

In other words, I would like to understand why the QM formalism is set up the way it is, from a mathematical modeling perspective.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Experiment -> QM postulates

Loading...

Similar Threads - Experiment postulates | Date |
---|---|

I Stern Gerlach Experiment | Monday at 8:05 AM |

I Thought experiment: Photons in a box | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Beam splitter in an entanglement swapping experiment | Feb 22, 2018 |

I Projection Postulate vs Quantum Randomness | Feb 14, 2018 |

B Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Experiment Results | Feb 7, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**