- #1
farukmert
I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
Because it's not necessary, trying to compare the two is nonsense.farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
Silly and flawed analogies are just that, not science.farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
You are right!farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
Heard of Electronics ?farukmert said:I ask for a brief answer; can you build a building without ground floor? you cannot. how can you build a theory without explaining the origin of first living organism? Give me a logical answer
Does it have a testable prediction that would allow us to disprove it?Pengwuino said:I thought we already have a theory on that... but not really anything to do with Evolution.
pattylou said:Does it have a testable and disprovable prediction?
Nah, that's great! Yes, it has a testable prediction. We ought to be able to disprove it.Pengwuino said:Your the biologists! What are you asking me for :tongue2:
Isnt the theory like... something hits the Earth with this atom (florine?) and it combined with the other atoms necessary for life and after a while, life was created. Guess it doesn't really predict anything other then life is possible elsewhere.. and unless you want to start pelting planets that looked like Earth from waaaaay back then with meteorites, i don't think its realistically testable.
Scientific enough for you? Geez!
pattylou said:Nah, that's great! Yes, it has a testable prediction. We ought to be able to disprove it.
I thought you were alluding to God and creationism.
I'm not entirely convinced that there is a fan in his case.:tongue:Gokul43201 said:it doesn't tell you the name of the worker in an assembly plant in Indonesia who mounted the fan in the back of your case.
The theory of spontaneous generation suggests that living organisms can arise from non-living matter through some kind of natural process.
The current scientific consensus is that the first living organism likely originated through a process known as abiogenesis, in which simple organic molecules combined and evolved into more complex forms of life.
Several lines of evidence support the theory of abiogenesis, including the Miller-Urey experiment, which showed that simple organic molecules can be formed in a simulated early Earth environment, as well as the discovery of ancient microbial fossils and the observation of similar processes occurring in present-day environments.
While scientists have successfully created simple organic molecules in laboratory experiments, the complete process of abiogenesis has not yet been replicated in a laboratory setting. However, ongoing research continues to shed light on the conditions and mechanisms that may have led to the origin of life.
Some scientists propose the theory of panspermia, which suggests that the first living organism may have originated from another planet and was brought to Earth through meteorites or other means. However, this theory is still being debated and more research is needed to support it.