1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Explanation for empirical horopter: density of photoreceptors in hemiretinas

  1. Jul 18, 2011 #1
    http://arapaho.nsuok.edu/~salmonto/vs3_materials/Lecture6.pdf [Broken]

    In this website (and in many more) in page 5, it’s written that photoreceptors are more densely packed in nasal areas of retina than temporal. That's one of the explanations why empirical horopter (that's the unit of all points in visual field, that are seen in the same position monocularly) deviates from theoretical. In page 6, in graphs we see that the same segment in visual field has longer arc in nasal retina than temporal (binocular vision). I don’t see how these two things agree: density of photoreceptors in nasal and temporal retinas and the magnitude of arcs. If compensation would be the case, then I think it should be reverse situation. Given there are less amount of photoreceptors in temporal area, arc should be longer than that of nasal - so that the quantity of photoreceptors in both areas would be the same.
    Does anybody have an idea?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Explanation for empirical horopter: density of photoreceptors in hemiretinas
  1. Empirical formula? (Replies: 1)

  2. Density ? (Replies: 2)

  3. Empirical Formula (Replies: 2)

Loading...