Exploring Geometrical Implications of Inner Product Spaces

In summary, Inner product spaces are motivated by geometric considerations, but there may be some confusion about the geometric implications associated with inner products. The results are often defined rather than derived in textbooks, leading to questions about their algebraic consistency versus geometric motivation. The use of complex conjugates and the inner product of two distinct vectors may also be unclear in terms of their geometric interpretation. The motivation for obtaining coefficients using the inner product of a vector with each orthonormal basis vector is not immediately clear. Additionally, the definition of the zero vector as perpendicular to all other vectors may be unsatisfying from a geometric perspective.
  • #1
mrxtothaz
14
0
The motivation for inner product spaces is geometric, yet I find myself a bit unclear about the geometrical implications associated with inner products. I would appreciate if some of my concerns could be addressed; while the length of my inquiry may be a bit much, I would like to make it clear that I do not require extensive explanations for all my questions.

1) It makes to me that if z = a + bi is a complex number, then |z| = sqrt(a2 + b2), as complex numbers can be interpreted as a pair (a,b) of real numbers. Complex conjugates are introduced so that |z|2 = a2 + b2 = zZ (I will denote complex conjugates by capital letters; in this case, Z).

In all the textbooks I've seen, none of these results are ever derived, but are only defined to be this way. This begs the question: Is all of this done to be algebraically consistent, or is there some geometric motivation that should be immediately clear (and therefore any derivation is trivial)?

2) If you want to calculate the length/norm of a vector over the complex numbers, the definition gives that ||z||2 = z1Z1 + ... + znZn. So in this light, ||z||2 is the inner product with itself (with complex conjugates). But if we want to find the inner product of z with a distinct vector w, for example, we get w1Z1 + ... + wnZn.

I am a bit uncertain about why the complex conjugate is used here. I'm pretty sure that this a convention, as inner products are linear iff one of the coordinates is fixed (but I would like to have someone confirm/deny this).

3) Perhaps a more serious concern related to the one above is of the geometric interpretation of the inner product of two distinct vectors. For example, in the above example, if you multiply w with z, and also w with Z, do the results differ? If so, what does this difference represent, geometrically?

I am aware that, using dot products, the number you get is the product of all the vector coordinates between two vectors, and the angle between those two vectors. It is clear that in the case of the inner product of a vector with itself, we obtain the norm (length).

Is there some intuitive interpretation for when two distinct vectors are multiplied? I can only make sense of inner products that are equal to 0 (meaning the vectors are perpendicular), negative (meaning the vectors are in opposite directions). But is there more you can infer from this number, that might have a clear geometric interpretation? I ask this primarily because whenever I see problems/theorems using inner products, the motivation for why some things are done is not clear geometrically, and only seems to be that it is done so that the algebra works out.

To give one example, there is a theorem that goes: "Suppose (e1,...,en) is an orthonormal basis for V. Then v = <v, e1>e1 + ... + <v, en>en". You also see this in many other results (like the Gram-Schmidt procedure). But it is not clear to me what any of the motivation is for obtaining the coefficients using the inner product of v with each orthonormal basis vector.

4) We have that the zero vector is perpendicular to all other vectors. What exactly do we mean (geometrically) by this? I think of the zero vector as a point (the origin), and so don't know how to make sense of this in a satisfying way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1) I don't know how much this helps, but |z|2 is defined the way it is because it gives a real number and it is multiplicative (|z|2|w|2 = |zw|2). It's an instance of something a bit more general. (Viewing C as a 2-dimensional vector space over R, |z|2 is the determinant of the linear map that multiplies by z. Exercise: Find the matrix of this linear map in the basis {1, i}, and then prove the above statement.)

2) I guess the main reason is that the squared length of any vector ought to be a real number.

3) I don't have good quick answer, sorry.

4) The unsatisfying answer is that treating 0 as perpendicular to everything else makes things nicer (for instance, you can simply say that if v and w are perpendicular vectors, then tv and w are perpendicular for any scalar t; also, the set of all vectors perpendicular to a given one forms a subspace). Perhaps another way to think about two vectors being perpendicular is that the projection of each one onto the other should be zero.
 

1. What is an inner product space?

An inner product space is a mathematical structure that consists of a vector space and an operation called the inner product. The inner product is a function that takes in two vectors and produces a scalar (a number). It has properties such as linearity, symmetry, and positive definiteness.

2. How is an inner product space different from a regular vector space?

An inner product space is a special type of vector space. In addition to the usual vector operations of addition and scalar multiplication, it also has the inner product operation. This allows for notions of length, angle, and orthogonality to be defined in the space.

3. What are some examples of inner product spaces?

Some common examples of inner product spaces include Euclidean spaces (such as the 2D and 3D Cartesian coordinate systems), function spaces (such as spaces of continuous functions), and matrix spaces (such as spaces of symmetric matrices).

4. How are inner product spaces used in practical applications?

Inner product spaces have many applications in mathematics, physics, and engineering. They are used to model physical quantities such as force and velocity, to analyze data in statistics and machine learning, and to solve optimization problems in economics and finance.

5. What are some important properties of inner product spaces?

Some important properties of inner product spaces include the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, the triangle inequality, and the Pythagorean theorem. These properties allow for the definition of notions such as norms, distances, and projections in the space, which are useful in various applications.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
957
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top