Exploring the Smallest Unit of Matter: Depth and Space Theories

In summary, according to standard particle physics, the smallest unit of matter is the atom. The atom cannot be divided in half and has no spatial displacement. Atoms are the best smallest parts of matter because they are the simplest and have the least amount of energy when divided.
  • #1
loopianoo
1
0
Does the smallest unit of matter have depth, or any quantity of space? My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half. So what is the smallest unit of matter, one that cannot be divided in half?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you heard of atoms?...
 
  • #3
Elementary particles, according to standard QM are point-like objects (with no spatial displacement), and according to string theory are string-like objects (1-D strings, weird stuff...).
 
  • #4
As noted above, in the standard model of particle physics, particles are modeled as idealized point like objects without size.

My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half.

This could possibly be true if space is really continuous as assumed in relativity...however such an assumption leads to infinites, divergences (inconsistences) between relativity and quantum mechanics...so we know something is not quite right with this idea as currently formulated.

You can read about Planck scale physics: you will find that below some minimum length/area/or volume, such as about 10-33 cm length, things cannot be further divided because quantum froth (uncertainty) may take hold...everything becomes jumbled in energetic undulations... time/space/matter as we know it becomes quantum foam...and these distinct entities as we know them on large scales become energetic uncertainties...akin, perhaps, to Heisenberg uncertainty...

An analogy to this minimum size at Planck scale in string theory is called "T duality" where, as a string radius is decreased in one model, it is the same as increasing the radius in another string model...so again there appears to be some minimums which nature may dictate.

But there is no absolute incontavertible experimental proof to any of the above explanations.
 
  • #5
loopianoo said:
Does the smallest unit of matter have depth, or any quantity of space? My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half. So what is the smallest unit of matter, one that cannot be divided in half?
Atoms are the best smallest parts of matter, especially those of noble gases.

Each division takes some energy. When you divide many noble gas atoms in groups, it takes little energy. As soon as you try to divide a single atom in parts, it takes much more energy. And the divided parts - charges - are very sticky. If not allowed to recombine in a neutral atom, they merge with matter very easily. Impossible to get rid of. Some think they are point-like. I say they are long-handed.
 
Last edited:

Related to Exploring the Smallest Unit of Matter: Depth and Space Theories

1. What is the smallest unit of matter?

The smallest unit of matter is called an atom, which is made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons.

2. What is the theory of depth and space?

The theory of depth and space suggests that matter is made up of tiny particles that are constantly moving and interacting with each other in a vast and complex space.

3. How do scientists explore the smallest unit of matter?

Scientists use tools such as microscopes and particle accelerators to study and manipulate subatomic particles, allowing them to explore the smallest unit of matter.

4. What are some real-world applications of understanding the smallest unit of matter?

Understanding the smallest unit of matter has led to advancements in various fields, such as medicine, technology, and energy production. For example, knowledge of subatomic particles has led to the development of medical imaging techniques and nuclear energy.

5. What are some challenges in exploring the smallest unit of matter?

One of the biggest challenges in exploring the smallest unit of matter is that subatomic particles are incredibly small and difficult to observe and manipulate. Additionally, the behavior of particles at this level can be unpredictable, making it challenging for scientists to fully understand and control them.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Math
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
574
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
9
Views
681
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top