Exponentiation of a matrix

  • Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date
  • #1
96
1
I need to retrieve a finite rotation matrix (with cos and sin) from the exponentiation of the infinitesimal version of it.

Suppose my infinitesimal matrix is ω. I then compute exp(ω).

My guess would be

[tex]\exp(\omega)=\sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k}}{2k!}+\sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

i.e. the even and odd contributions.

The notes I'm reading suggest instead:

[tex]\exp(\omega)=I+\sum_{k=1}\frac{\omega^{2k}}{2k!}+\sum_{k=1}\frac{\omega^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

which looks weird to me; if I take the identity matrix I to be the k=0 contribution of the even part (ω^0=1), then I don't know where the term linear in ω is in the series any more. I think it's not there at all.

Even more: I do need the k=0 contributions later on to retrieve the series expansion expressions for cos and sin.

What do you think? Any comments?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
AlephZero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
6,994
291
I agree. Replacing the ##\omega^0/0!## term by ##I## is fair enough, but the second sum should be from ##k = 0##.

It's probably just a typo.
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
956
?? The "linear term in [itex]\omega[/itex]" is the term with [itex]\omega^1[/itex] which means it is the term in the second sum with k= 0: [itex]\frac{\omega^{2(0)+ 1}}{(2(0)+ 1)!}= \omega[/itex].

The linear approximation to [itex]e^\omega[/itex] is [itex]I+ \omega[/itex].
 
  • #4
FactChecker
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,790
2,157
I agree. It's a typo. If you are doing this, don't forget that you can use the characteristic equation of the matrix ω to eliminate all the high powers.
 

Related Threads on Exponentiation of a matrix

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
760
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
857
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
587
Top