1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Exponetial and natural log

  1. May 30, 2008 #1
    Is it true that

    [tex]e^{2(2x+ln2)} = e^{4x}e^{2ln2}[/tex]

    I cant see how that is true? According to a paper mark scheme it is.

    Can someone clarify
    Thanks :)
  2. jcsd
  3. May 30, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    First open up the brackets:
    [tex]e^{2(2x+\ln 2)} = e^{4x + 2 \ln 2}[/tex]
    Then use a rule for [tex]e^{a + b}[/tex] which you (should) know.

    Actually, you can even simplify it further to [itex]4 e^{4x}[/itex].
  4. May 30, 2008 #3
    is this the same with all powers or just the exponetial function... hang on, is it a function?
  5. May 30, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Well, the first simplification (the one you asked about) works in general. If x is any number and a and b are two expressions, then
    [tex]x^{a + b} = x^a x^b[/tex]
    so in particular it works for x = e, a = 4x and b = 2 ln(2).

    The further simplification I spoke about just works because ln[..] is the inverse of exp[..] = e^[...]
  6. May 30, 2008 #5
    yeah i can see the second one.
    The first one makes sense now. Yes. I just didn't see it with the 'e'

    cheerz :)
  7. Jun 1, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    So the lesson to be learnt, perhaps, is that
    can be viewed both as the function "exp" evaluated in (some number) x, or as the number [itex]e \approx 2,7\cdots[/itex] raised to the power (some number) x and that how you view it depends on the context (e.g. when differentiating it, one should view it as a function; when using simplification rules like here it's easier to just view it as an exponentiation).
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Exponetial and natural log
  1. Natural logs (Replies: 7)

  2. Natural Log (Replies: 4)