let K be an extention field of L and L be an extenstion field of F.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(1) t(a)=a ,for all t e G(K,F)

(2) t(a)=a ,for all t e G(L,F)

where e means "belongs to" , G(K,F) means "set of all automorphisms of K

leaving every element of F fixed and similarly for G(L,F).

i would like to know is (2) implies (1) or (1) implies (2)?

i think (2) implies (1) but not sure.[i have used simple logic no.of automorphisms of K =< no.of auto. of L]

if not then please give answer with counter example,if there no relation between

them then explain with reasion.

thanks in advanced for help me

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Extention field

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**