hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

i am given the definition of an exterior derivative as its invariant formula not as the classical coordinate way. ie, i have dw(X1,...,Xn+1) = sum(-1)^i-1 Xi(w(X1,...^Xi^,...,Xn+1)

+ sum(-1)^i+j (w([Xi,Xj],X1,...^Xi^,...,^Xj^,...,Xn+1) where the hats means omitted X.

and i dont have that dw= d(sum wJ dx^J)= sum dwJ wedge dx^J

i want to prove that d^2 = 0 and that d(w1 wedge w2) = dw1 wedge w2 + (-1)^k w1 wedge dw2.

thing is, i want to do that directly from my definition bc its a nasty process trying to prove that the 2 definitions are equivalent then proving the properties on the other definition.

im failing to do that though, any ideas?

thx a lot.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Exterior derivative

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**