hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

i am given the definition of an exterior derivative as its invariant formula not as the classical coordinate way. ie, i have dw(X1,...,Xn+1) = sum(-1)^i-1 Xi(w(X1,...^Xi^,...,Xn+1)

+ sum(-1)^i+j (w([Xi,Xj],X1,...^Xi^,...,^Xj^,...,Xn+1) where the hats means omitted X.

and i dont have that dw= d(sum wJ dx^J)= sum dwJ wedge dx^J

i want to prove that d^2 = 0 and that d(w1 wedge w2) = dw1 wedge w2 + (-1)^k w1 wedge dw2.

thing is, i want to do that directly from my definition bc its a nasty process trying to prove that the 2 definitions are equivalent then proving the properties on the other definition.

im failing to do that though, any ideas?

thx a lot.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Exterior derivative

Loading...

Similar Threads - Exterior derivative | Date |
---|---|

I Product rule for exterior covariant derivative | May 15, 2017 |

A Interior products, exterior derivatives and one forms | Oct 29, 2016 |

A Square of the exterior derivative | Oct 19, 2016 |

A Why the terms - exterior, closed, exact? | May 15, 2016 |

I Prove what the exterior derivative of a 3-form is... | Apr 11, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**