Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

F(R) gravity

  1. Jul 12, 2012 #1
    hey guys , is there anybody here to give me a nice reference for f(R) gavity ?


    Regards


    thecoop
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 12, 2012 #2
    What is f(R) gravity?
     
  4. Jul 12, 2012 #3

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    There's a Wikipedia page about it, for what it's worth. It has references to what appear to be legitimate publications.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F(R)_gravity

    It appears to be a serious research area, although probably a bit out of the mainstream. I'd never heard of it, either.
     
  5. Jul 12, 2012 #4
    It would be a theory with a modified Hilbert-Einstein action, where the density is not proportiomal to the Ricci scalar R, but to some non-linear function of it.

    The modified field equations will contain the Ricci curvature in a non-linear way, and might disallow the possibility of a black hole.

    By dimensional analysis, one can construct a dimensionless quantity from c, [itex]\hbar[/itex], G, and R:
    [tex]
    \frac{G \, R}{\hbar \, c^{3}}
    [/tex]
    Also, we can construct a combination with the dimension of an action density:
    [tex]
    \left[ \frac{S}{x^4} \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-1} \, \mathrm{L}^{-2} \, \mathrm{M} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{-4}
    [/tex]
    Because [itex]\left[ G \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-2} \, \mathrm{L}^{3} \, \mathrm{M}^{-1} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{2}[/itex], we ought to have [itex]\mathcal{L} \propto G^{-2}[/itex]. Returning the proper powers of [itex]\hbar[/itex], and c, we get:
    [tex]
    \mathcal{L} \propto \frac{c^6}{\hbar \, G^2}
    [/tex]
    Thus, we can write:
    [tex]
    S_{g} = \frac{c^6}{\hbar G^2} \, \int{f\left( \frac{\hbar \, G \, R}{c^3} \right) \, \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x}
    [/tex]

    If you require the Planck's constant to drop out of the expression, you ought to have:
    [tex]
    f(x) = A \, x
    [/tex]
    i.e. the Lagrangian density is proportional to the scalar curvature. This is the ordinary Hilbert-Einstein action. The numerical constant A is fixed by Newton's Law of universal Gravitation.

    We might be tempted to choose a different functional form. For example, let us see if we can get G, the Universal Gravitational constant, to drop out from the expression. In a sense, this would make the action purely quantum effect. It is easy to see that this happens if:
    [tex]
    f_{2} = B \, x^2
    [/tex]
    A quadratic function dominates a linear function for large values of the argument, i.e. for:
    [tex]
    R \gg \frac{A}{B} \, L^{-2}_{P}
    [/tex]
    where [itex]L_{P} = \sqrt{G \, \hbar/c^{3}} \sim 10^{-35} \, \mathrm{m}[/itex] is the Planck length.

    There is, however, a problem with choosing a non-linear function. Namely, [itex]R[/itex] contains second derivatives of the metric tensor, but as a 4-gradient. Therefore, they get integrated out when the function is linear. But, one cannot do the same for a nonlinear function, and the equations that we would get would contain derivatives higher than two of the metric tensor.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: F(R) gravity
  1. F=G M1 M2 /(r^2) (Replies: 3)

Loading...