F:x->y ?

  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,297
205
my question: does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
191
0
Well...if it's bijective...yes...and it's a homomorphism...I guess...[?]
 
  • #3
653
0
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
my question: does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?
there is a set of morphisms between any objects in your category. so while it is not correct to say that x-->y implies y-->x, it is true that there exists a set of morphisms (which might be trivial) from y-->x. but this is not dependent on the morphisms from x-->y
 

Related Threads on F:x->y ?

  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top