Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Falling Tic-Tac dynamics.

  1. Feb 18, 2012 #1
    Ok, just a few minutes back, a tic-tac slipped from my hand and fell to the ground.

    The second bounce was to a lower height than the first (which is expected because e*<1) but then as it took the third bounce, it rose to a height higher than the one reached by it than in the second bounce.

    I had observed this phenomenon before in pebbles, but today I sat down and started thinking about it, I came up with the following result :

    I noticed (after dropping the tic-tac about a hundred times) that the height of a bounce is higher than the one preceding it only in one particular case : when the tic-tac hits one end on the floor first and then hits the floor a second time before bouncing back.

    To make sense of this, I followed energy conservation.
    The tic-tac originally has a potential energy of mgh and when it bounces back to a new height, it has no transnational kinetic energy, some potential energy and most importantly: Rotational kinetic energy.
    Now to make the tic-tac reach a max height, the rotational kinetic energy would have to be minimum.
    So what actually happens is that when a tic-tac hits the floor a second time in the same cycle, it gets a torque in the opposite direction to what it got in the first hit in the same cycle, hence reducing the rotational and by conservation of energy, making it reach to a higher height.

    That's what I came up with, is it even remotely correct to what is actually going on? Any other thoughts?


    *e = coefficient of restitution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 18, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi AlchemistK! :smile:
    Wow, that's amazing … I didn't know you could do that with tic-tacs! :biggrin:

    Yes, that seems a correct analysis.

    I wonder whether there's a similar manouevre in gymnastics?

    I think you should do a few more experiments, and then publish!

    eg, what's the coefficient of restitution for a tic-tac? :wink:
     
  4. Feb 18, 2012 #3
    I have a counter reasoning too though, since the tic-tac hits for a second time, it looses more energy as heat and sound.


    How do I do that? With all the various uncontrollable variables like friction, angle of drop, and other things, it seems impossible.


    And also, I noticed that the phenomenon occurs more when the tic-tac is dropped at a certain angle, further supporting that the reasoning is correct because the tic tac would only hit twice if dropped at a certain angle.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Falling Tic-Tac dynamics.
  1. Tic-Tac-Toe and time (Replies: 2)

  2. Free fall (Replies: 10)

  3. Falling to Earth (Replies: 12)

Loading...